2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.10.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Protected Areas on Forest Cover Change and Local Communities: Evidence from the Peruvian Amazon

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
51
0
5

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
51
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The relationship between land-cover change and its various explanatory variables are affected by geographical scale of the study, different sub-regions within the overall system and different time periods considered [5,25,26,39,54,59,60]. Although our study is done at one scale (landscape level), different zones and eras are considered in explaining the relationship between explanatory variables and land-cover change.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationship between land-cover change and its various explanatory variables are affected by geographical scale of the study, different sub-regions within the overall system and different time periods considered [5,25,26,39,54,59,60]. Although our study is done at one scale (landscape level), different zones and eras are considered in explaining the relationship between explanatory variables and land-cover change.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tal es el caso de la problemática de la defo-Problemática territorial y conservación de la biodiversidad en espacios protegidos de Argentina restación en el Amazonas y sus efectos sobre los espacios protegidos en Brasil (Barber, Cochrane, Souza, & Laurance, 2014); los efectos sobre los espacios protegidos a consecuencia de los cambios de uso del suelo en el Amazonas peruano y en la península de Yucatán en México (García-Frapolli, Ayala-Orozco, Bonilla-Moheno, Espadas-Manrique, & Ramos-Fernández, 2007;Miranda, Corral, Blackman, Asner, & Lima, 2016); el análisis de las consecuencias de la ocupación humana en espacios protegidos de Perú (Dourojeanni, 2014); o el análisis de los efectos negativos que los actuales y futuros cambios de uso del suelo podrían tener en torno a los espacios protegidos en Estados Unidos (Hamilton et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Given that the particular impacts are more easily amenable to quantifi cation than some other aspects of human well-being, it is not surprising that IE studies have emphasized them. In this literature, household surveys are the primary way in which scholars have constructed indicators of socioeconomic impact such as wealth ranking, asset valuation, and access to employment, education, water, and electricity (e.g., Clements et al 2014;Miranda et al 2016). Figure 3 shows the geographic distribution of studies evaluating the impacts of forest conservation interventions on human well-being and ecological outcomes.…”
Section: Experimental and Quasi-experimental Impact Evaluation Approamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, in the context of new donor strategies and emphasis on interlinkages among the SDGs, there is increasing demand for studies examining both social and ecological impacts. A growing number of studies suggest this demand is beginning to be met (e.g., Alix-Garcia et al 2012;Ferraro et al 2011;Miranda et al 2016;Pfaff et al 2014;Scullion et al 2014). IE approaches have evolved to cover more countries and have generally increased over time, but they have also evolved substantively.…”
Section: Experimental and Quasi-experimental Impact Evaluation Approamentioning
confidence: 99%