2020
DOI: 10.1093/jas/skaa332
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of processing, moisture, and storage length on the fermentation profile, particle size, and ruminal disappearance of reconstituted corn grain

Abstract: Our objective was to examine the effects of processing, moisture, and anaerobic storage length of reconstituted corn grain on the fermentation profile, geometric mean particle size and ruminal DM disappearance. Dry corn kernels were ground (hammer mill, 5-mm screen) or rolled, then rehydrated to 30, 35 or 40% moisture, and stored for 0, 14, 30, 60, 90, 120 or 180 d in laboratory silos. Rolled corn had an increased geometric mean particle size compared with ground corn (2.24 and 1.13 mm, respectively, at ensili… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(50 reference statements)
3
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The inclusion criteria were as follows: diet was offered as a total mixed ration, diet contained at least 300 g/kg dry matter (DM) of ensiled or dry corn grain, and ensiled grain contained a minimum of 280 g/kg of moisture, because the moisture content affects the conservation process, digestibility, and energy value of corn grain silage (Owens and Basalan, 2013;Gomes et al, 2018). Nine publications were found, but one failed to attain our criterium for minimum moisture content of ensiled corn (Carareto, 2011).…”
Section: Literature Search and Inclusion Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inclusion criteria were as follows: diet was offered as a total mixed ration, diet contained at least 300 g/kg dry matter (DM) of ensiled or dry corn grain, and ensiled grain contained a minimum of 280 g/kg of moisture, because the moisture content affects the conservation process, digestibility, and energy value of corn grain silage (Owens and Basalan, 2013;Gomes et al, 2018). Nine publications were found, but one failed to attain our criterium for minimum moisture content of ensiled corn (Carareto, 2011).…”
Section: Literature Search and Inclusion Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies conducted in Brazil determined that the inclusion of ensiled corn kernels in diets can improve the feed efficiency of growing/finishing cattle by an average of 14% as a result of an average 12% feed intake reduction (Berndt et al, 2002;Costa et al, 2002;Putrino, 2006;Henrique et al, 2007;Silva et al, 2007;Almeida Júnior et al, 2008;Carareto, 2011;Caetano et al, 2015;Silva, 2015;Tres, 2015;Silva, 2016). However, these benefits of grain ensiling are based on three major factors (Gomes et al, 2018): moisture content (Owens et al, 1997), particle size (Rémond et al, 2004), and length of storage time (Hoffman et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grain silage conservation requires adequate moisture content to allow microbial growth and activity (Pahlow et al, 2003). Despite the wide range of moisture contents that result in well-fermented silages, the data in the literature suggest that 35% moisture is the optimal target to enhance fermentation, increase proteolysis, and improve starch degradability (Neuhaus and Totusek, 1971;Barol et al, 1986;Gomes et al, 2018). Based on these findings, we reconstituted sorghum grains with the aim of reaching 35% moisture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…silage (Gomes et al, 2018), and storage longer than 2 mo might be needed to optimize starch digestibility (Da Silva et al, 2019).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%