2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2021.06.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of probiotics on body adiposity and cardiovascular risk markers in individuals with overweight and obesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
22
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
3
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Evidence suggests that supplementing with probiotics can significantly reduce obesity-related indicators. Both single and multi-bacterial species can significantly reduce body weight, TNF-α, insulin, total cholesterol, and low density lipid-cholesterol levels [8]. Probiotics can significantly reduce the fasting blood sugar of patients, and their effects are better than those obtained in patients without insulin therapy [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence suggests that supplementing with probiotics can significantly reduce obesity-related indicators. Both single and multi-bacterial species can significantly reduce body weight, TNF-α, insulin, total cholesterol, and low density lipid-cholesterol levels [8]. Probiotics can significantly reduce the fasting blood sugar of patients, and their effects are better than those obtained in patients without insulin therapy [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results were supported by the existence of data showing a biological plausibility for the health benefits of probiotic. First, probiotic intake might be helpful to reduce risk factors for all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality such as obesity, hypertension, and type 2 diabetes (29)(30)(31). Second, probiotic foods had been reported to repress oxidative stress and inflammatory marker profile in both healthy persons and patients with disorders (32)(33)(34).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study will employ the Cochrane Risk Assessment Tool to evaluate the methodological quality of the included literature in six primary areas: selection bias, implementation bias, detection signal bias, loss to follow-up bias, information bias and other biases. 16 Each domain is classified into three categories: low risk of bias, high risk of bias and unclear risk of bias. The overall quality of an individual study is considered good if more than two domains are low risk, fair if two domains are low risk and poor if less than two domains are low risk.…”
Section: Methods and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study will employ the Cochrane Risk Assessment Tool to evaluate the methodological quality of the included literature in six primary areas: selection bias, implementation bias, detection signal bias, loss to follow-up bias, information bias and other biases 16. Each domain is classified into three categories: low risk of bias, high risk of bias and unclear risk of bias.…”
Section: Methods and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%