2015
DOI: 10.3832/ifor1078-007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of planting density on the distribution of biomass in a douglas-fir plantation in southern Italy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Estimating belowground biomass is therefore a complex process which requires much effort in terms of time and cost for collecting data (Niiyama et al 2010;Ruiz-Peinado et al 2013;Marziliano et al 2014). Although the research conducted on this topic is extensive, quantitative knowledge on belowground biomass distribution in forest ecosystems still remains scarce (Cairns et al 1997;Brunner and Godbold 2007;Litton et al 2007).…”
Section: Handling Editor: Shuqing Zhaomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estimating belowground biomass is therefore a complex process which requires much effort in terms of time and cost for collecting data (Niiyama et al 2010;Ruiz-Peinado et al 2013;Marziliano et al 2014). Although the research conducted on this topic is extensive, quantitative knowledge on belowground biomass distribution in forest ecosystems still remains scarce (Cairns et al 1997;Brunner and Godbold 2007;Litton et al 2007).…”
Section: Handling Editor: Shuqing Zhaomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Information on the effects of planting density and thinning on C sequestration by multipurpose tree species is scarce (Jandl et al, 2007) but on conifers particularly in Europe are available (Marziliano et al, 2015;Coletta et al, 2016); similarly, thinning and pruning interaction may influence growth and development of tree by affecting resources availability (Beadle et al, 2007). However, information on the impact of various cutting management levels in combination with high density plantation (HDP) on the biomass and carbon stock of woody perennial based land use systems is still unavailable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Italy a BCEF value of 1.4 Mg m -3 for exotic conifer plantations C-reporting is suggested by the INFC (National Forest and Carbon Inventory, 2005). It was shown though that BCEF changes with age in Douglas-fir plantations in southern Italy (Marziliano et al, 2015a), therefore using the constant value as reported by INFC leads to an underestimation of biomass for the younger stands and an overestimation of biomass for the older stands (Marziliano et al, 2015b). In specific studies, prediction models for BCEFs have been proposed to better reflect stand characteristics comparatively to the use of a constant and unique (average value) for the species (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%