2017
DOI: 10.5424/fs/2017261-10239
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomass conversion and expansion factors in Douglas-fir stands of different planting density: variation according to individual growth and prediction equations

Abstract: Aim of study: We built biomass expansion factors (BCEFs) from Douglas-fir felled trees planted with different planting densities to evaluate the differences according tree size and planting density.Area of study: The Douglas-fir plantation under study is located on the northern coastal chain of Calabria (Tyrrhenian side) south Italy. Materials and methods:We derived tree level BCEFs, relative to crown (BCEF c ), to stem (BCEF st = basic density, BD) and total above-ground (BCEF t ) from destructive measurement… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
(32 reference statements)
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The moderate thinnings not only increase the biomass production of trees [72][73][74], but also improve the wood quality in trees, as highlighted in this study. However, Nakamura [75], using ultrasonically induced waves to assess the wood quality in larch trees, had already observed significant differences in the wave velocity and in MOEd values for forest stands characterized by different density some decades ago.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…The moderate thinnings not only increase the biomass production of trees [72][73][74], but also improve the wood quality in trees, as highlighted in this study. However, Nakamura [75], using ultrasonically induced waves to assess the wood quality in larch trees, had already observed significant differences in the wave velocity and in MOEd values for forest stands characterized by different density some decades ago.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%