2000
DOI: 10.1094/phyto.2000.90.12.1313
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Planting Density and the Composition of Wheat Cultivar Mixtures on Stripe Rust: An Analysis Taking into Account Limits to the Replication of Controls

Abstract: Garrett, K. A., and Mundt, C. C. 2000. Effects of planting density and the composition of wheat cultivar mixtures on stripe rust: An analysis taking into account limits to the replication of controls. Phytopathology 90: 1313-1321.The effect of plant density on disease is not well understood in populations of a single host plant genotype and has been studied even less in mixtures of host genotypes. We performed an experiment to evaluate the effect of wheat planting density on infection by Puccinia striiformis i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But, in this experiment, there was no evidence for an influence of planting density on hostdiversity effects, as might be expected because of the small density effects in single-genotype stands. This is in contrast to wheat stripe rust, for which there was a large influence of planting density on host-diversity effects (12). Differences in the influence of density in these two systems may be due in part to differences in plant architecture and pathogen dispersal, but it would be useful to consider lower potato densities than were included in this experiment to clarify the comparison.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…But, in this experiment, there was no evidence for an influence of planting density on hostdiversity effects, as might be expected because of the small density effects in single-genotype stands. This is in contrast to wheat stripe rust, for which there was a large influence of planting density on host-diversity effects (12). Differences in the influence of density in these two systems may be due in part to differences in plant architecture and pathogen dispersal, but it would be useful to consider lower potato densities than were included in this experiment to clarify the comparison.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, several recent studies have found either no effect of density or a negative association between planting density and disease severity (5,7,12,20). One reason that disease may show little response to density changes is that the realized density of foliage may be similar over planting densities (20).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second step in the analysis of disease severity was to compare the linear responses of the two different diseases to the proportion of susceptible genotype in mixture (11,15). For each experimental unit (plot), we estimated the difference between the slopes of the curves for the two diseases using data from the third sampling date.…”
Section: Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Practices such as deployment of crops in mixtures, intercrops, or polycultures may be an important component in perennial grain agriculture (4,7,8,17,18,30,46). But whether perennials are mixed within polycultures or uniform in monocultures, resistance to a set of locally important cereal diseases will be an essential managerial component (3,7).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%