2005
DOI: 10.1094/pd-89-0969
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Plant Spacing, Inoculation Date, and Peanut Cultivar on Epidemics of Peanut Stem Rot and Tomato Spotted Wilt

Abstract: Two microplot studies were conducted with peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) in 2000, 2001, and 2002 to determine the effects of plant spacing, inoculation date, and cultivar on stem rot development caused by Sclerotium rolfsii Sacc., tomato spotted wilt incidence, and microclimate (temperature and relative humidity). Stem rot severity and incidence decreased as plant spacings were increased in 5-cm increments from 5 to 30 cm. Two cultivars with similar susceptibility but different growth habits were compared. Perha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
15
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The various studies conducted on plant densities have showed on various effects diseases with their respective hosts. The present results are in concurrence with the results of Sconyers et al (2005) The inoculation of mycorrhizal fungi significantly increased the total chlorophyll content in mycorrhizal groundnut plants due to increase in their photosynthetic ability and when mycorrhizal fungus has primary access to photosynthates, the higher carbon demand may inhibit pathogen growth (Azcón-Aguilar and Barea, 1996), thereby causing interference in photosynthetic ability of groundnut plants. But total chlorophyll content was increased in diseased mycorrhizal groundnut plants probably due to colonization by mycorrhiza which helped in increasing photosynthetic ability.…”
Section: Total Biomasssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The various studies conducted on plant densities have showed on various effects diseases with their respective hosts. The present results are in concurrence with the results of Sconyers et al (2005) The inoculation of mycorrhizal fungi significantly increased the total chlorophyll content in mycorrhizal groundnut plants due to increase in their photosynthetic ability and when mycorrhizal fungus has primary access to photosynthates, the higher carbon demand may inhibit pathogen growth (Azcón-Aguilar and Barea, 1996), thereby causing interference in photosynthetic ability of groundnut plants. But total chlorophyll content was increased in diseased mycorrhizal groundnut plants probably due to colonization by mycorrhiza which helped in increasing photosynthetic ability.…”
Section: Total Biomasssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In locations with either high or moderate levels of stem rot, disease incidence clearly increased with increasing plant stand in plots either not treated or treated with flutolanil. Sconyers et al (2005) found a similar positive correlation between stem rot incidence and plant stand densities in peanut, and attributed this to increased plant-to-plant mycelial spread occurring irrespective of the number of inoculum sources within the row. Our observations support that theory.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…With runner peanuts in Georgia, growers often plant 19.7 seeds/m seeking to obtain a final density of 13 plants/m or 142,500 plants/ha to reduce risk of TSWV (Baldwin, 2005). Sconyers et al (2005) found that a within row population of 13 plants/m had extensive spread of stem rot on the Georgia Green cultivar in microplot experiments. Stands of 3 plants/m had negligible disease spread while 5 to 10 plants/m were intermediate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many of the factors that comprise the spotted wilt risk index also influence the development of fungal diseases (Brenneman and Hadden, 1996;Monfort et al 2004;Sconyers et al 2005;Cantonwine et al 2006); therefore, a similar integrated approach should be helpful in the management of fungal diseases. A Fungal Disease Risk Index Woodward, 2006) has been developed, using criteria such as cultivar, crop rotation, field history, planting date, irrigation, and tillage.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%