Effects of pig slurry application on soil physical and chemical properties and glyphosate mobility

Oliveira, D.A; Pinheiro, Adílson; Veiga, Milton da

doi:10.1590/s0100-06832014000500007

Cited by 8 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 38 publications

(55 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Caovilla et al (2010) attributed the higher P contents in the 0-0.20 m layer to the increase in organic matter caused by SWW, with a trend toward reduced P content due to the reduction of organic matter as depth increases. An increase in P content in superficial soil layers under fertilization with SWW has also been reported by Oliveira, Pinheiro and Veiga (2014) in dystrophic Red Latosol and by Veiga et al (2012) in a typic dystrophic Red Latosol. The mean values of P found at both depths in the present study are considered adequate according to Sobral et al (2015), indicating it is not necessary to correct the P contents in the soil.…”

Section: Casupporting

confidence: 53%

“…The pH of the soil was not affected by the SWW, but there were significant differences in the means at the evaluated soil depths at 0.01 probability level (Table 3). The response of soil pH to the SWW application is highly variable, because some studies show no changes (CABRAL et al, 2011;CASSOL et al, 2012;BRUNETTO et al, 2012;MAGGI et al, 2013;HOMEM et al, 2014;SILVA et al, 2015;BERNARDES, 2017), some show an increase (SMANHOTTO et al, 2010;LOURENZI et al, 2011;PRIOR et al, 2015;DA ROS et al, 2017) and others show a decrease (VEIGA et al, 2012;OLIVEIRA;PINHEIRO;VEIGA, 2014).…”

Section: Camentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Homem et al (2014) found swine wastewater had no influence on K and Mg contents or pH. Nevertheless, Oliveira, Pinheiro and Veiga (2014) observed that swine wastewater had little influence on soil physical and chemical attributes, but soil pH decreased and P content increased in the surface layers. Veiga et al (2012) reported that continuous application of swine wastewater doses for nine years in a no-tillage system, with rotation of oats, maize and soybean, acidified the soil and increased Al, P, Cu and Zn contents at 0.20 m depth.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 97%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Soil Changes and Yield of Maize Fertilized With Swine Wastewater

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Swine wastewater can be used as a biofertilizer and promote significant improvements in soil physical-chemical attributes and yield. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of swine wastewater application on soil and maize yield. The experiment was conducted at the Agricultural Sciences Center of the Federal University of Piauí, in Teresina, Piauí, Brazil, from August to November 2015. The experimental design used completely randomized blocks in split-plot scheme, with five doses of swine wastewater (0, 25, 50, 75 and 100 m3 ha-1) in the plots and two soil depths (0.20 and 0.40 m) in the subplots, with four replications. Exchangeable contents of calcium, magnesium, phosphorus, potassium and sodium, electrical conductivity, pH, sum of bases, base saturation, potential acidity and cation exchange capacity, and crop yield were evaluated. Results showed calcium, magnesium, sum of bases and cation exchange capacity increased with elevated levels of swine wastewater. Potassium and sodium contents however decreased with doses of 51.58 and 52.28 m3 ha-1, respectively. Except for potassium and potential acidity, variables showed higher values at the 0-0.20 m depth.

show abstract

Section: Casupporting

confidence: 53%

Section: Camentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 97%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Soil Changes and Yield of Maize Fertilized With Swine Wastewater

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For the same reason, the application of manures can minimize the reduction of TOC content in tillage systems that determine high oxidation rate of the soil organic matter, especially those that result in great soil mobilization (Hati et al, 2008). In the literature consulted, the only type of manure that does not necessarily result in an increase in TOC content is the pig slurry (Cenciani et al, 2008;Andrade et al, 2016;Oliveira et al, 2014;Comin et al, 2013), which is associated with the low organic matter content in this type of waste. Thus, a higher increase in TOC is expected when the manure presents high dry matter content and higher C:N ratio, as observed in poultry litter (Ojeniyi, 2008) and cattle manure (Dunjana et al, 2012), as well as in organic compounds (Lynch et al, 2005).…”

Section: Total Organic Carbonmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The reduction in bulk density occurs both with the application of manures alone(Celik et al., 2004; Barzegar et al, 2002, Bulluck et al, 2002) and in association with mineral fertilizers (Hati et al, 2006a, Hati et al, 2007; Bandyopadhyay et al, 2010; Hati et al, 2008). However, the application of pig slurry usually does not alter bulk density(Arruda et al, 2010;Oliveira et al, 2014), due to the low percentage of organic matter in the material. The application of poultry litter, bovine slurry and pig slurry at recommended doses to supply nutrients to crops for a period of ten years also did not alter significantly bulk density(Veiga et al, 2007).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Animal Manure as Fertilizer: Changes in Soil Attributes, Productivity and Food Composition

Loss

Couto

Brunetto

et al. 2019

Int. J. Res. Granthaalayah

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Animal manure (AM), such as swine, cattle, sheep, horse, as well as other organic waste materials from recycling agri-food or other processes may be used as nutrient source for horticultural annual and perennial crops, increasing nutrient cycling and reducing costs related to acquisition of industrial fertilizers. Additionally, over the years it is expected to modify chemical, physical, and biological soil attributes such as increasing the nutrient content in the soil, which can affect crop productivity, change the food composition, fruit and vegetable storage aptitudes, and impact on the environment. The present review addresses the effect of AM applications on the soil-plant interface, emphasizing the following aspects: (a) changes in chemical, physical and biological attributes in soils with a history of AM applications, (b) effect of application of AM on annual plant productivity and (c) AM as fertilizer: productivity and food composition of horticultural crops. Successive applications of AM in soils tend to increase the chemical and physical attributes, and, increased production of grain crops. Effect of AM fertilizations on quality and nutritional value of fruits is still uncertain; it depends on several factors, including: 1) characteristics of organic matter, 2) pedoclimatic conditions, 3) time of application and 4) plant species.

show abstract

Effect of swine manure on soil health properties: A systematic review

Yost

Schmidt

Koelsch

et al. 2022

Soil Science Soc of Amer J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A comprehensive review of research data on the effects of swine manure on soil health properties that is applicable to agricultural producers is lacking. The objectives of this review were (a) to synthesize literature describing effects of swine manure on soil properties that affect “soil health” and (b) to identify knowledge gaps and research needs to further our understanding of this topic. We reviewed papers from two databases and extracted soil property and swine manure data based on a set of criteria. For a paper to be included, (a) the studies were replicated field experiments, (b) manure was the only differing factor between or among treatments, and (c) data means of swine manure amended treatments and controls were included. In total, 40 papers met the criteria and were included. Based on this review, swine manure has the potential to significantly increase soil organic carbon. Soil organic carbon, soil organic matter, and microbial biomass carbon increased when swine manure was applied to crop fields, whereas bulk density tended to decrease. To conclude, previous literature reviews failed to account for differences in methodologies between individual research studies and whether research is applicable to producers utilizing swine manure as amendments to improve soil health. Future research studies should measure and report a standard set of metrics for both soil and manure properties and should investigate the effects of application frequency on short‐ and long‐term soil health properties.

show abstract

Effects of pig slurry application on soil physical and chemical properties and glyphosate mobility

Cited by 8 publications

References 38 publications

Soil Changes and Yield of Maize Fertilized With Swine Wastewater

Soil Changes and Yield of Maize Fertilized With Swine Wastewater

Animal Manure as Fertilizer: Changes in Soil Attributes, Productivity and Food Composition

Effect of swine manure on soil health properties: A systematic review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About