Effects of peat compaction on delta evolution: A review on processes, responses, measuring and modeling

Asselen, S. van; Stouthamer, Esther; Asch, Th.W.J. van

doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2008.11.001

Cited by 144 publications

(96 citation statements)

References 58 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Sequences of salt-marsh sediment are a valuable archive for reconstructing RSL because salt marshes accrete sediment to preserve their elevation in the tidal frame under regimes of rising RSL where sediment supply is not limited, or where salt-marsh accretion results primarily results from organogenic growth (Morris et al, 2002). However, samples of salt-marsh sediment used to reconstruct sea level may have undergone post-depositional lowering (PDL) by compaction of underlying sediment (Jelgersma, 1961;Bloom, 1964;Allen, 1999Allen, , 2000van Asselen et al, 2009). PDL causes an over-estimation of the amount and rate of reconstructed sea-level rise (Horton and Shennan, 2009;Horton et al, 2013).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Quantifying the Contribution of Sediment Compaction to late Holocene Salt-Marsh Sea-Level Reconstructions, North Carolina, USA

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

'Quantifying the contribution of sediment compaction to late Holocene salt-marsh sea-level reconstructions, North Carolina, USA.', Quaternary research., 83 (1). pp. 41-51. Further information on publisher's website:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yqres. 2014.08.003 Publisher's copyright statement: NOTICE: this is the author's version of a work that was accepted for publication in Quaternary Research. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be re ected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A de nitive version was subsequently published in Quaternary Research, 83/1, 2015Research, 83/1, , 10.1016Research, 83/1, /j.yqres.2014 Additional information: Use policyThe full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-pro t purposes provided that:• a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.Please consult the full DRO policy for further details.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Quantifying the Contribution of Sediment Compaction to late Holocene Salt-Marsh Sea-Level Reconstructions, North Carolina, USA

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The recalculated compaction ratio for organic-rich deposits in the Rhine-Meuse delta is up to 1.7:1; however, its average value is ~1.4:1 (Van Asselen et al 2009;Van Asselen 2011). In the case of the mangrove peats in Singapore, the average compaction ratio ranges between 1.2:1 and 2.2:1 (Text- fig.…”

Section: Density Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The density method has been used successfully in the estimation of the amount of compaction of modern mires (e.g. Bird et al 2004;Van Asselen et al 2009;Van Asselen 2011). These studies reviewed the above-described method in detail; for more information the reader is directed to the papers cited.…”

Section: Density Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Coal rank Source peat Bird et al, 2004;Van Asselen et al, 2009;Van Asselen, 2011density lignite Falini, 1965Volkov, 1965lignite Glockner, 1912Ting, 1977inclusions bituminous Teichmüller, 1955Stach et al, 1975;Zaritsky, 1997;DeMaris et al, 1983;Gayer andPe ek, 1992 lignite Piwocki, 1975;Stout and Spackman, 1989;Hurník, 1990;Kojima et al, 1998;Widera, 2013asubbituminous White, 1986 indirect petrographic bituminous Courel, 1978;Winston, 1986peat Bloom, 1964Haslett et al, 1998lignite Hurník, 1972Hager et al, 1981;Hager, 1993;Kasi ski, 1984Kasi ski, , 1985Widera, 2002;Widera et al, 2007 direct stratigraphic bituminous this paper …”

Section: Category Of Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Most of the modern mires, for which the compaction has been extensively investigated, are younger than 10 ka (e.g. Bloom 1964;Haslett et al 1998;Allen 2000;Bird et al 2004;Long et al 2006;Van Asselen et al 2009;Van Asselen 2011). Thus, the plant matter in the mire beds is less decomposed than in the lignite seams.…”

Section: Paradoxmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Compaction of lignite: a review of methods and results

Widera¹

2015

Acta Geologica Polonica

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ABSTRACT:Widera, M. 2015. Compation of lignite: a review of methods and results. Acta Geologica Polonica, 65 (3), 367-378. Warszawa.The published peat:coal compaction ratios range from 1.1:1 to 60:1 and from 1.1:1 to 11:1 for lignites. These probably represent realistic end-member values for the degree of compaction during the transformation of peat into lignite and then to coal. Hence, in many cases, the obtained values of the compaction ratio are under-or overestimated with reference to the entire coal seam.This study focuses on the changes of thickness between a peat bed and the resulting lignite seam. The fundamental question is how many times the thickness of the peat bed, prior to covering the mire by the overburden, was greater than the present-day thickness of the lignite seam.The majority of methods reported in this paper cannot be used directly to quantify the amount of compaction of the lignite seam. In this context, the only category of methods which allow a direct estimation of the peat:lignite compaction ratio are the so-called stratigraphic methods. Therefore, based on comparison of the initial peat bed thickness with lignite seam thickness, the most accurate peat:lignite compaction ratio ranges from 2:1 to 4:1.

show abstract

Loss on ignition and organic content

Plater

Kirby

Boyle

et al. 2015

Handbook of Sea‐Level Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The importance of loss-on-ignition (LOI) and organic matter (OM) analyses in Holocene sea-level and coastal evolution research is reviewed, and recommendations for better-informed inclusion of LOI and differential thermogravimetric analysis (DTGA) in sea-level studies are presented. Focus also centers on the significance of autocompaction, and the use of LOI data for its correction, with respect to Holocene intertidal sediment successions and saltmarsh sedimentary archives of historical sea-level change. Finally, we comment on the use of δ13C and C/N ratio data for determining OM provenance in relation to studies of coastal change over a range of timescales

show abstract

Effects of peat compaction on delta evolution: A review on processes, responses, measuring and modeling

Cited by 144 publications

References 58 publications

Quantifying the Contribution of Sediment Compaction to late Holocene Salt-Marsh Sea-Level Reconstructions, North Carolina, USA

Quantifying the Contribution of Sediment Compaction to late Holocene Salt-Marsh Sea-Level Reconstructions, North Carolina, USA

Compaction of lignite: a review of methods and results

Loss on ignition and organic content

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About