2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0377-8401(02)00007-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of patulin on rumen microbial fermentation in continuous culture fermenters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The presence of patulin in feed for livestock would be a concern because it can alter metabolism of nutrients by ruminal microbes (48). This is the first report of the toxigenic potential of P. roqueforti and P. paneum growing on grass silage in Ireland.…”
Section: P Roqueforti and P Paneum Secondary Metabolites Inmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The presence of patulin in feed for livestock would be a concern because it can alter metabolism of nutrients by ruminal microbes (48). This is the first report of the toxigenic potential of P. roqueforti and P. paneum growing on grass silage in Ireland.…”
Section: P Roqueforti and P Paneum Secondary Metabolites Inmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Similar results were confirmed recently by Jiang et al (2012) incubating different AFB 1 doses (0–0·96 μ g/ml) in diluted lactating cow rumen fluid. Tapia et al (2002) showed a negative dose-dependent (doses of mycotoxin: 0–90 μ g/ml) effect of patulin on nutrient digestion, nitrogen metabolism and energy utilization of a rumen inoculum sampled from fistulated dry cows. Morgavi et al (2004) stated that only very high levels of gliotoxin, up to 80 μ g/ml of rumen inoculum, influenced DM degradation, gas and VFA productions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each combination of F/B × diet was used once in each of the 4 incubation runs. The diet was supplied daily in 2 equal portions at 0900 and 1500 h. The flow through all fermenters was maintained by continuous infusion of McDougall (1948) artificial saliva (approximately 53 mL/h) to achieve an outflow rate (5.3%) similar to that of other studies (Tapia et al, 2002;Carro et al, 2009;Molina-Alcaide et al, 2009), and CO 2 was continuously infused into the fermentation flask to maintain anaerobic conditions. Two different F/B were achieved by changing the feed input while keeping constant the volume of artificial saliva infused.…”
Section: Experimental Procedures and Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%