2017
DOI: 10.1002/2017jd026696
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Parameterized Orographic Drag on Weather Forecasting and Simulated Climatology Over East Asia During Boreal Summer

Abstract: The impact of subgrid orographic drag on weather forecasting and simulated climatology over East Asia in boreal summer is examined using two parameterization schemes in a global forecast model. The schemes consider gravity wave drag (GWD) with and without lower‐level wave breaking drag (LLWD) and flow‐blocking drag (FBD). Simulation results from sensitivity experiments verify that the scheme with LLWD and FBD improves the intensity of a summertime continental high over the northern part of the Korean Peninsula… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The next‐generation global model KIM under development at the Korea Institute of Atmospheric Systems (KIAPS) is used in this study (Hong et al, ). KIM consists of a spectral element nonhydrostatic dynamic core on a cubed‐sphere and a state‐of‐the‐art physics package (Baek, ; Choi et al, ; Choi & Hong, ; Hong et al, ; Koo et al, ; Kwon & Hong, ; Park et al, ). The physics package of the most up‐to‐date KIM (version 3.1) is summarized in Table .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The next‐generation global model KIM under development at the Korea Institute of Atmospheric Systems (KIAPS) is used in this study (Hong et al, ). KIM consists of a spectral element nonhydrostatic dynamic core on a cubed‐sphere and a state‐of‐the‐art physics package (Baek, ; Choi et al, ; Choi & Hong, ; Hong et al, ; Koo et al, ; Kwon & Hong, ; Park et al, ). The physics package of the most up‐to‐date KIM (version 3.1) is summarized in Table .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The physics package of the most up‐to‐date KIM (version 3.1) is summarized in Table . While most physics schemes originate from the Global/Regional Integrated Model System and the Weather Research and Forecast model but have been revised by KIAPS scientists (see the references in Table ), some physics schemes, such as radiation, gravity wave drag, and cloudiness, have been inventively developed at KIAPS (Baek, ; Choi et al, ; Choi & Hong, ; Park et al, ). The main focus of the present study is an understanding of the formation and dissipation of the shallow convective clouds via interaction with PBL mixings and their modification in order to improve the KIM performance.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parameterization can help reduce systematic model biases, such as the cold-pole bias associated with too strong westerlies in the mid and high latitudes, and delayed breakdown of the polar vortex in Antarctica (Palmer et al 1986;Shin et al 2010;McLandress et al 2012;Pithan et al 2016;Garcia et al, 2017;Garfinkel and Oman 2018). Furthermore, medium-and short-range weather predictions can also benefit from OGW parameterization (Hong et al 2008;Zhong and Chen 2015;Choi and Hong 2015;Choi et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then, the parameterization of the effect of low‐level wave breaking, accompanied by nonlinear resonant amplification of both the hydrostatic and nonhydrostatic waves and lee‐wave trapping in the downstream regions, has resulted in a distinct improvement in both the medium‐range forecast and the seasonal ensemble prediction (Hong et al, ; Kim & Arakawa, ). Furthermore, the introduction of parameterization of the flow‐blocking drag increased the drag in the low troposphere, which led to directly improving the simulations of the low‐level wind and indirectly enhancing those of other synoptic features (Choi et al, ; Choi & Hong, ; Kim & Doyle, ; Lott & Miller, ; Zadra, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Choi and Hong (; hereafter C2015) recently updated a mesoscale orographic drag scheme by including the effects of flow‐blocking drag in a global forecast model. Although this approach improved both the weather forecasting and seasonal climatology in the model, the comparison with the results from the Working Group for Numerical Experimentation drag project shows that the SSO scheme of C2015 exerts a relatively large orographic drag in the lower‐to‐middle troposphere, due to the exaggeration in flow‐blocking drag (Choi et al, ; hereafter C2017). Note that the turbulent orographic form drag scheme was not considered in C2015 and C2017.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%