1988
DOI: 10.1016/0269-7491(88)90159-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of ozone on foliar leaching in Norway spruce (Picea abies L. Karst): Confounding factors due to NOx production during ozone generation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chambers were illuminated by metal-halide lamps providing a photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) of 180-200 µmol m −2 s −1 at plant height supplied as a 16 h photoperiod. Air temperature was controlled at a minimum of 18 • C at night, rising to a daytime maximum of 25 • C. Ozone was generated from particulate/charcoal/Purafil -filtered air by electric discharge (Wallace & Tiernan BA.023 Laboratory Ozonator, Tonbridge, Kent, UK), fitted with a limestone scrubber to prevent contamination by higher oxides of nitrogen (Brown & Roberts, 1988). Routine measurements of the nitrogen content of plant material grown in these chambers have verified that contamination with higher oxides of nitrogen is not a problem in these CE chambers (Barnes et al, 1995).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chambers were illuminated by metal-halide lamps providing a photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) of 180-200 µmol m −2 s −1 at plant height supplied as a 16 h photoperiod. Air temperature was controlled at a minimum of 18 • C at night, rising to a daytime maximum of 25 • C. Ozone was generated from particulate/charcoal/Purafil -filtered air by electric discharge (Wallace & Tiernan BA.023 Laboratory Ozonator, Tonbridge, Kent, UK), fitted with a limestone scrubber to prevent contamination by higher oxides of nitrogen (Brown & Roberts, 1988). Routine measurements of the nitrogen content of plant material grown in these chambers have verified that contamination with higher oxides of nitrogen is not a problem in these CE chambers (Barnes et al, 1995).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ozone was generated by a silent electrical discharger in dry air, passed through a water trap, and introduced into chambers with an air stream, in which the plants were placed. The water trap eliminated by-products such as N205 produced by an ozone generator with electrical discharges in the air (Brown and Roberts 1988). The concentrations of O3 in the chambers were continuously monitored with UV absorption ozone analyzers (Dashibi, model 1003AH, California, USA) and regulated by a controlling system based on proportional integral derivative (PID) logic (Dylec Co., model DACS-1000, Tokyo).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From 16 April, 2004 to 1 November, 2005, the seedlings were exposed to charcoal-filtered air or three levels of O3 at 1.0, 1.5 or 2.0 times the ambient concentration, these O3 treatments being designated as CF, O3 1.0, O3 1.5 and O3 2.0, respectively. Ozone was generated from oxygen-enriched dry air by an electrical discharge O3 generator (Oz-24-UA, Ebara Corporation, Japan) and injected into 9 OTCs for O3-exposure through a water trap to remove nitrogen by-products such as N2O5, produced by the O3 generator (Brown and Roberts, 1988). The concentrations of O3 in the 12 OTCs at 90 cm above the floor were continuously monitored at intervals of 12 minutes with a UV absorption O3 analyzer (ML9810, Monitor Labs, USA).…”
Section: Ozone Exposure and Nitrogen Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%