2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2018.02.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of operation height and tree shape on droplet deposition in citrus trees using an unmanned aerial vehicle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
62
1
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
62
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, the number of this kind of study highly increased from 2016 as well as expanded to other sprayed targets. For instance, Zhang et al started to focus on UAV application for citrus and found the variation of droplet distribution [12] , while Tang et al concentrated on the deposition changes affected by tree shapes [13] . Similar studies regarding UAVs and spray factors include T10 UAV for wheat scab control [14] , Response Surface Method for the test of P20 UAV parameters [15] , tree shapes and flight heights for the deposition of 3W-LWS-Q60S [16] , the comparison of four types of UAVs [17] , the method of detection of effective spray swath of 3WQF120-12 [18] , different operation parameters for several stages of corns [19] , low-attitude droplets deposition [20] , drift caused by different types of UAVs [21] , deposition on pineapple trees impacted by operation parameters [22] and the control effect of wheat powdery mildew using different operation parameters [23] .…”
Section: Key Technology Of Caused Results Of Uav Downwash Acting On Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the number of this kind of study highly increased from 2016 as well as expanded to other sprayed targets. For instance, Zhang et al started to focus on UAV application for citrus and found the variation of droplet distribution [12] , while Tang et al concentrated on the deposition changes affected by tree shapes [13] . Similar studies regarding UAVs and spray factors include T10 UAV for wheat scab control [14] , Response Surface Method for the test of P20 UAV parameters [15] , tree shapes and flight heights for the deposition of 3W-LWS-Q60S [16] , the comparison of four types of UAVs [17] , the method of detection of effective spray swath of 3WQF120-12 [18] , different operation parameters for several stages of corns [19] , low-attitude droplets deposition [20] , drift caused by different types of UAVs [21] , deposition on pineapple trees impacted by operation parameters [22] and the control effect of wheat powdery mildew using different operation parameters [23] .…”
Section: Key Technology Of Caused Results Of Uav Downwash Acting On Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The images of the droplet deposition states were processed using MATLAB, which could determine the spray coverage of the target leaf. The ratio of the number of pixels occupied by the red fog droplets in the captured image to the total number of pixels in the image was taken as the result of the droplet coverage rate C dro [38]. The target leaf surface droplet deposition state was recorded, and the surface droplet drop coverage was calculated.…”
Section: Spray Parameters Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…An overall image of the orchard is shown in Figure 1a. Considering the spraying height [32], the topographic relief of the orchard, and the height of the fruit trees, the camera distance for the UAV was set to 10-15 m. During each image acquisition process, the image collection section was set vertically downward, and the UAV was suspended steadily in the air until each image was fully collected. The data were stored as joint photographic expert group (JPEG) format to implement a debugging algorithm on a personal computer (PC).…”
Section: The Study Area and The Uav Equipmentmentioning
confidence: 99%