2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0303-2647(01)00146-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of non-synaptic neuronal interaction in cortex on synchronization and learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to measure the degree of synchronization among the network nodes belonging to a cell assembly, the correlation coefficient between the activities of the nodes in one pattern is computed and compared with the correlation between the member and non-member nodes of the pattern (Aronsson P. & Liljenström, H. 2001). The oscillatory phase in the cell assemblies was computed with the help of a Hilbert transform.…”
Section: Synchronizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to measure the degree of synchronization among the network nodes belonging to a cell assembly, the correlation coefficient between the activities of the nodes in one pattern is computed and compared with the correlation between the member and non-member nodes of the pattern (Aronsson P. & Liljenström, H. 2001). The oscillatory phase in the cell assemblies was computed with the help of a Hilbert transform.…”
Section: Synchronizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The olfactory nervous system is relatively simple and well-known functionally and morphologically, and is an interesting system for understanding the cognitive processes performed in the brain. Even when some brain processes remains unclear, many aspects of olfaction, such as the mechanisms of reception and central processing or the nature of the stimuli have been fairly extensively studied [3,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…G. HALES EM¯eld e®ects have been routinely reported all along, leading some researchers to expect the \closed loop" behavior of Fig. 1(b) (Anastassiou et al, 2010;Aronsson & Liljenstrom, 2001;Bikson et al, 2004;Bishop & Oleary, 1950;Faber & Korn, 1989;Francis et al, 2003;Je®erys, 1981Je®erys, , 1995Je®erys & Haas, 1982;McIntyre & Grill, 1999;Noebels & Prince, 1978;Parra & Bikson, 2004;Rall & Shepherd, 1968;Reato et al, 2010;Taylor & Dudek, 1982;Terzuolo & Bullock, 1956). The cultural partitioning of views, along open/closed loop EM¯eld lines, was su±ciently unsettling that it once lead to a call for resolution (Bullock, 1997).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%