2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2010.04.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of non-native spruce plantations on small mammal communities in subarctic birch forests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the distinction between coniferous, mixed and deciduous forest becomes arbitrary because foresters often cut down one type of forest and plant different one at the same site (e.g., Pedersen et al 2010). Instead, we run two models: (1) including only data points from coniferous stands and (2) including data points from coniferous, deciduous and mixed stands.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the distinction between coniferous, mixed and deciduous forest becomes arbitrary because foresters often cut down one type of forest and plant different one at the same site (e.g., Pedersen et al 2010). Instead, we run two models: (1) including only data points from coniferous stands and (2) including data points from coniferous, deciduous and mixed stands.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, because of the importance of unharvested refugia, sometimes it might be better to conduct small-scale clearcutting than large-scale lower-intensity disturbance such as thinning (Trout et al 2012). Forest harvest that results in changed species composition of stands, particularly when the endpoint are large-scale monocultures, is more likely to be detrimental to small mammals than harvest that does not result in tree species conversion (Pedersen et al 2010). Leaving more coarse woody debris in harvested stand is highly recommended and has been recognized as a crucial practice for maintaining populations of small mammals and other wildlife (Siitonen 2001).…”
Section: Management Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). In a related article on small mammal community dynamics Pedersen et al (2010b) described vegetation composition (i.e. structural heterogeneity) at each of the 400 trap station (see Table 1; Pedersen et al 2010b).…”
Section: Landscape Blocks and Forest Typesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a related article on small mammal community dynamics Pedersen et al (2010b) described vegetation composition (i.e. structural heterogeneity) at each of the 400 trap station (see Table 1; Pedersen et al 2010b). Composition of the forest habitat was distinctly different between the spruce plantations (including the spruce section of the ecotone) and the birch dominated forest types (including mixed spruce-birch plantations).…”
Section: Landscape Blocks and Forest Typesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation