2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2020.02.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of non-linear resistance training and curcumin supplementation on the liver biochemical markers levels and structure in older women with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chashmniam et al [ 31 ] did not report statistical significance for any of the parameters examined, but also noted a decrease in ALT levels (50.08 ± 7.27 U/L vs. 43.28 ± 4.91 U/L) and AST (35.16 ± 3.9 U/L vs. 31.85 ± 3.41 U/L). All six of the other studies observed decreases in ALT levels after supplementation, but these were not statistically significant [ 29 , 30 , 32 , 34 , 35 , 36 ]. For AST, Ghaffari et al [ 30 ] observed an increase in levels from 24 ± 11.5 U/L to 24.1 ± 8.90 U/L ( p = 0.92); decreases were observed in the remaining studies, but only Panahi et al [ 33 ] and Rahmani et al [ 28 ] obtained statistically significant results (35.4 ± 11.9 U/L vs. 22.6 ± 7.2 U/L, p < 0.001 and 28.88 ± 10.60 U/L vs. 23.84 ± 7.83 U/L, p < 0.001, respectively).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Chashmniam et al [ 31 ] did not report statistical significance for any of the parameters examined, but also noted a decrease in ALT levels (50.08 ± 7.27 U/L vs. 43.28 ± 4.91 U/L) and AST (35.16 ± 3.9 U/L vs. 31.85 ± 3.41 U/L). All six of the other studies observed decreases in ALT levels after supplementation, but these were not statistically significant [ 29 , 30 , 32 , 34 , 35 , 36 ]. For AST, Ghaffari et al [ 30 ] observed an increase in levels from 24 ± 11.5 U/L to 24.1 ± 8.90 U/L ( p = 0.92); decreases were observed in the remaining studies, but only Panahi et al [ 33 ] and Rahmani et al [ 28 ] obtained statistically significant results (35.4 ± 11.9 U/L vs. 22.6 ± 7.2 U/L, p < 0.001 and 28.88 ± 10.60 U/L vs. 23.84 ± 7.83 U/L, p < 0.001, respectively).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In most of the trials, the mean age of the patients was in the range of 37.41–49.4 years ( Table 2 ) [ 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 ]. In one study, the average age of the respondents was 66.72 years [ 35 ], in another, the mean age of the study group was not given, but ranged between 18–70 years [ 36 ]. The average BMI values were in the 27.6–31.81 kg/m 2 range.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations