1999
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.1999.00752.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of nitrous oxide on haemodynamic and electroencephalographic responses induced by tetanic electrical stimulation during propofol anaesthesia

Abstract: SummaryWe studied the effect of nitrous oxide on haemodynamic and electroencephalographic responses caused by noxious stimulation during propofol anaesthesia. Thirty-four patients (ASA I-II) were anaesthetised with propofol 3 mg.kg ¹1 and were randomly allocated to receive either 60% nitrous oxide in oxygen or 40% oxygen in air. Anaesthesia was maintained using propofol infusion of 10 mg.kg ¹1 .h ¹1 for the first 10 min, 8 mg.kg ¹1 .h ¹1 for the next 10 min and 6 mg.kg ¹1 .h ¹1 thereafter. Thirty minutes after… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(36 reference statements)
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding corroborates the results of Inada et al (1999), who demonstrated hemodynamic stability associated with the use of N 2 O and propofol. This finding is also consistent with a report by Nishimori et al (2007), who also observed cardiovascular stability using propofol at a dose of 0.4 mg kg -1 min -1 in association with 30% N 2 O.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This finding corroborates the results of Inada et al (1999), who demonstrated hemodynamic stability associated with the use of N 2 O and propofol. This finding is also consistent with a report by Nishimori et al (2007), who also observed cardiovascular stability using propofol at a dose of 0.4 mg kg -1 min -1 in association with 30% N 2 O.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…However, we assume that the depth of anaesthesia in both groups can be considered to be clinically similar. We could have monitored the depth of anaesthesia by measuring, for example, the bispectral index (BIS) or spectral edge frequencies from the electroencephalogram (EEG) [27,28]. However, even with such EEG‐derived parameters, it would not be possible to achieve an equal depth of anaesthesia between the groups because propofol and isoflurane have different effects on EEGs and thus the patterns of the EEG during each type of anaesthesia is different [29,30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of these, we selected 225 for full‐text review, of which 188 papers were excluded because they did not meet our eligibility criteria. After this process we identified a further 15 papers, reporting on 12 studies , which also required exclusion for not meeting these criteria. Of these 12 studies, six did not include an intervention or comparator relevant to this review , in five studies the depth of anaesthesia differed between study arms [ and two papers reported on the ENIGMA‐2 study , which did not measure AAGA.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%