1982
DOI: 10.1016/0014-2999(82)90574-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of nitroprusside on pancreatic juice secretion in the blood-perfused canine pancreas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A clearer dissociation of pancreatic protein secretion from PMBF has also been observed in multiple unrelated studies. For example, no change in PMBF was reported despite observing that NOS inhibitors reduce secretin-stimulated in vivo pancreatic secretion in cats (41) and that the NO donor sodium nitroprusside increases in vivo pancreatic protein secretion (17,41). To explain this dissociation between stimulated pancreatic protein secretion and PMBF, and the relationship of NO to both, Patel et al (41) proposed that NO may exert its principal effect through a nonvasodilatory mechanism, possibly by modulating vagal stimulation of secretory cells or directly stimulating acinar cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…A clearer dissociation of pancreatic protein secretion from PMBF has also been observed in multiple unrelated studies. For example, no change in PMBF was reported despite observing that NOS inhibitors reduce secretin-stimulated in vivo pancreatic secretion in cats (41) and that the NO donor sodium nitroprusside increases in vivo pancreatic protein secretion (17,41). To explain this dissociation between stimulated pancreatic protein secretion and PMBF, and the relationship of NO to both, Patel et al (41) proposed that NO may exert its principal effect through a nonvasodilatory mechanism, possibly by modulating vagal stimulation of secretory cells or directly stimulating acinar cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The systemic blood pressure was monitored by a transducer (Nihon Kohden, Model RP-3). The pancreas was haemodynamically isolated in situ according to a procedure which has been previously described and illustrated diagrammatically (Hashimoto et al 1971;Iwatsuki et a/, 1982). Polyethylene cannulae were inserted into the pancreaticoduodenal and splenic arteries and used to perfuse the pancreas with the animal's own blood, conducted from the left femoral artery by means of a peristaltic pump (Harvard, Model 1210).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These inhibitory and stimulatory responses to SP on pancreatic secretion stimulated by three secretagogues caused by SP were not modified by pretreatment with atropine (100 pg), propranolol (300 pg), phentolamine (100 pg), or cimetidine (100 pg) at doses high enough to block the action of the specific agonists (Table 1). The blockers used in this study did not affect the secretagogue-induced secretion (Iwatsuki et al 1982). Bradykinin (100 ng), injected intra-arterially, caused a vasodilation and decreased the perfusion blood pressure to the same extent as SP (100 ng) (Fig.…”
Section: Effects Of Sp On Stimulated Pancreatic Secretionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We developed the dog isolated pancreas preparation in situ which was perfused with the animal's own blood (Hashimoto et a/. 1971;Iwatsuki et al 1982). This preparation is convenient for studies of the direct effects of drugs whilst eliminating circulatory, hormonal and central nervous effects on secretion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%