2001
DOI: 10.1053/rvsc.2001.0507
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of nitric oxide donor and nitric oxide synthase inhibitor on ruminal contractions in conscious sheep

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4, and 5), and the saline infusion did not significantly change either parameter. Consistent with our previous observations (Onaga et al 2001), intravenous L-NAME infusion did not alter the frequency of ruminal contractions. Though L-NAME tended to inhibit the amplitude of ruminal contractions at the highest dose, the changes were not significant compared to the value before infusion and that at the same time point in saline infusion.…”
Section: Effect Of Snap On Ovine Gastric Motilitysupporting
confidence: 93%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…4, and 5), and the saline infusion did not significantly change either parameter. Consistent with our previous observations (Onaga et al 2001), intravenous L-NAME infusion did not alter the frequency of ruminal contractions. Though L-NAME tended to inhibit the amplitude of ruminal contractions at the highest dose, the changes were not significant compared to the value before infusion and that at the same time point in saline infusion.…”
Section: Effect Of Snap On Ovine Gastric Motilitysupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The present study demonstrated that intravenous infusion of the NO donor, SNAP, inhibited omasal EMG activity in healthy sheep at doses that inhibited regular ruminal contraction (Onaga et al 2001), whereas it did not alter EMG activity of the ovine abomasal antrum. SNAP application to smooth muscle strips of the omasal greater curvature also inhibited BCh-induced contractions of both the longitudinal and circular muscles, and the inhibition was more potent in the latter than in the former.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
See 3 more Smart Citations