2008
DOI: 10.1080/15205430701582512
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Negative Political Advertising on Individuals' Cynicism and Self-Efficacy: The Impact of Ad Type and Message Exposures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This assumption is supported by research in social and cognitive psychology (Cacioppo and Petty 1979) and consumer advertisement (Anand and Sternthal 1990;Yaveroglu and Donthu 2008), and might come from the fact that repeated messages are perceived as more valid, and thus imbued with a stronger persuasive effect (Moons, Mackie, and Garcia-Marques 2009). 2 In the field of (negative) political advertisement several studies also highlight that when respondents are repeatedly exposed to messages with the same valence the effects of such messages increases (Dardis, Shen, and Edwards 2008;Fernandes 2013;Schenck-Hamlin, Procter, and Rumsey 2000).…”
Section: Volume Effects Of Positive and Negative Messagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This assumption is supported by research in social and cognitive psychology (Cacioppo and Petty 1979) and consumer advertisement (Anand and Sternthal 1990;Yaveroglu and Donthu 2008), and might come from the fact that repeated messages are perceived as more valid, and thus imbued with a stronger persuasive effect (Moons, Mackie, and Garcia-Marques 2009). 2 In the field of (negative) political advertisement several studies also highlight that when respondents are repeatedly exposed to messages with the same valence the effects of such messages increases (Dardis, Shen, and Edwards 2008;Fernandes 2013;Schenck-Hamlin, Procter, and Rumsey 2000).…”
Section: Volume Effects Of Positive and Negative Messagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If research on political advertising has fully embraced the study of volume and valence (e.g., Dardis, Shen, and Edwards 2008;Fernandes 2013;Shapiro and Rieger 1992;Stevens 2009), surprisingly little is known today about how different sequences of negative and positive messages affect evaluations of those exposed to them. However, assessing the effects of messages sequences has much to contribute to our knowledge of electoral dynamics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this situation, the source of this attack may be considered aggressive and unscrupulous [100]. As a consequence, negative political messages may also produce strong counterarguments [106][107][108][109]; information obtained from this source may be ignored by the public [110], considered unbelievable [111], and even elicit a "boomerang effect"-(change to the opposite direction from the advocated position) [112] and "backlash effect" (negative feelings towards the source of the message, without a significant impact on the attitudes towards the object of attack) [113][114][115][116].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Political ideology has been found to influence individuals' political attitudes and voting behaviors (e.g., Dardis, Shen, & Edwards, 2008). It can also affect how individuals process political advertising (Chang, 2003;Lemert, Wanta, & Lee, 1999).…”
Section: Control Variablesmentioning
confidence: 98%