Is bad news on TV tickers good news? The effects of voiceover and visual elements in video on viewers’ assessment

Abstract

In our experiment, we tested how exposure to a mock televised news segment, with a systematically manipulated emotional valence of voiceover, images and TV tickers (in the updating format) impacts viewers' perception. Subjects (N = 603) watched specially prepared professional video material which portrayed the story of a candidate for local mayor. Following exposure to the video, subjects assessed the politician in terms of competence, sociability, and morality.Results showed that positive images improved the assessment of the politician, whereas negative images lowered it. In addition, unexpectedly, positive tickers led to a negative assessment, and negative ones led to more beneficial assessments. However, in a situation of inconsistency between the voiceover and information provided on visual add-ons, additional elements are apparently ignored, especially when they are negative and the narrative is positive. We then discuss the implications of these findings. OPEN ACCESSCitation: Maj K, Lewandowsky S (2020) Is bad news on TV tickers good news? The effects of voiceover and visual elements in video on viewers' assessment. PLoS ONE 15(4): e0231313. https://

Human or Machine? How Much Difference in Understanding and Trust Does a Human Element Make in Storm Forecasts?

“…The literature continues to show differing results on what kinds of messages work, however. With regard to images and visuals and their impacts on viewer perception, other studies have shown that positive images and additional, verbal information can have a corresponding positive impact on viewer perceptions of messages such as advertisements (Meade & Zhou, 2017) or political campaigns (Maj & Lewandowsky, 2020). When it comes to visuals and hurricanes, Rickard and colleagues (Rickard et al, 2017) noted that images of dramatic storm damage can increase awareness among those subjects who had not yet experienced a hurricane; however, some of the reactions/assessments of storm risk in those subjects could be extreme or over-the-top compared to the actual risk.…”