Effects of MR surface coils on PET quantification

Abstract

Purpose: The goal of this work was to investigate the effects of MRI surface coils on attenuationcorrected PET emission data. The authors studied the cases where either an MRI or a CT scan would be used to provide PET attenuation correction (AC). Combined MR/PET scanners that use the MRI for PET AC (MR-AC) face the challenge of absent surface coils in MR images and thus cannot directly account for attenuation in the coils. Combining MR and PET images could be achieved by transporting the subject on a stereotactically registered table between independent MRI and PET scanners. In this case, conventional PET CT-AC methods could be used. A challenge here is that high atomic number materials within MR coils cause artifacts in CT images and CT based AC is typically not validated for coil materials. Methods: The authors evaluated PET artifacts when MR coils were absent from AC data (MR-AC), or when coil attenuation was measured by CT scanning (CT-AC). They scanned PET phantoms with MR surface coils on a clinical PET/CT system and used CT-AC to reconstruct PET data. The authors then omitted the coil from the CT-AC image to mimic the MR-AC scenario. Images were acquired using cylinder and anthropomorphic phantoms. They evaluated and compared the following five scenarios: (1) A uniform cylinder phantom and head coil scanned and reconstructed using CT-AC; (2) similar emission data (with head coil present) were reconstructed without the head coil in the AC data; (3) the same cylinder scanned without the head coil present (reference scan); (4) a PET torso phantom with a full MR torso coil present in both PET and CT; (5) only half of the separable torso coil present in the PET/CT acquisition. The authors also performed analytic simulations of the first three scenarios. Results: Streak artifacts were present in CT images containing MR surface coils due to metal components. These artifacts persisted after the CT images were converted for PET AC. The artifacts were significantly reduced when half of the separable coil was removed during the scan. CT scans tended to over-estimate the linear attenuation coefficient (l) of the metal components when using conventional methods for converting from CT number to l(511 keV). Artifacts were visible outside the phantom in some of the PET emission images, corresponding to the MRI coil geometry. However, only subtle artifacts were apparent in the emission images inside the phantoms. On the other hand, the PET emission image quantitative accuracy was significantly affected: the activity was underestimated by 19% when AC did not include the head coil, and overestimated by 28% when the CT-AC included the head coil. Conclusions: The presence of MR coils during PET or PET/CT scanning can cause subtle artifacts and potentially important quantification errors. Alternative CT techniques that mitigate artifacts should be used to improve AC accuracy. When possible, removing segments of an MR coil prior to the PET/CT exam is recommended. Further, MR coils could be redesigned to reduce artifacts by rear...

Markerless attenuation correction for carotid MRI surface receiver coils in combined PET/MR imaging

“…With results from this study and previous coil attenuation studies, it is evident that hardware attenuation correction is required for combined PET/MR to reach its potential as an accurate quantitative diagnostic tool (Kartmann et al , 2013; Delso et al , 2010; Eldib et al , 2014; MacDonald et al , 2011; Paulus et al , 2012; Dregely et al , 2014). …”

Hybrid PET/MR Imaging of the Heart: Potential, Initial Experiences, and Future Prospects

“…Hardware vendors redesigned the hardware components in order to minimize their impact, but their effects are still measurable (26,34), albeit of uncertain impact on diagnostic scans in larger patient cohorts. In the specific case of cardiac imaging, the preliminary data now available point to a good general agreement between PET/CT and PET/MR in FIGURE 1.…”

Vision 20/20: Magnetic resonance imaging‐guided attenuation correction in PET/MRI: Challenges, solutions, and opportunities

“…121 Moreover, the bilinear energy mapping of CT to attenuation coefficients at 511 keV for nonbiological materials might not be valid. 116 In this regard, Paulus et al, 122 optimized the bilinear CT energy mapping procedure of hardware PET/MR components through the calibration of CT numbers of these components using transmission scanning and reported a reduction of SUV bias in the NEMA phantom from 3.1% to −0.5%.…”

“…In brain imaging, several studies demonstrated that atlas-based segmentation or registration techniques can properly segment or predict bones. 30,70 Our ranking of patient-specificity of emission-based AC methods for lung and bone LACs is conservative as they are merely based on a few recent 42,116 studies showing the high potential of these methods for the derivation of lung LACs. However, further studies are required to demonstrate the performance of these AC methods for different tracers, cohorts of patients, and TOF resolutions.…”