2012
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Mountain Pine Beetle on Fuels and Expected Fire Behavior in Lodgepole Pine Forests, Colorado, USA

Abstract: In Colorado and southern Wyoming, mountain pine beetle (MPB) has affected over 1.6 million ha of predominantly lodgepole pine forests, raising concerns about effects of MPB-caused mortality on subsequent wildfire risk and behavior. Using empirical data we modeled potential fire behavior across a gradient of wind speeds and moisture scenarios in Green stands compared three stages since MPB attack (Red [1–3 yrs], Grey [4–10 yrs], and Old-MPB [∼30 yrs]). MPB killed 50% of the trees and 70% of the basal area in Re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

15
105
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
15
105
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More open canopies and high loads of large surface fuels due to tree fall have been shown to significantly increase surface fireline intensities (Schoennagel et al 2012). Our study shows that drought die-off and subsequent fire are potentially linked disturbances (in that one impacts the probability or severity of the next).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…More open canopies and high loads of large surface fuels due to tree fall have been shown to significantly increase surface fireline intensities (Schoennagel et al 2012). Our study shows that drought die-off and subsequent fire are potentially linked disturbances (in that one impacts the probability or severity of the next).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Such variation allowed us to assess fire severity across the spectrum of recent prefire outbreak severity, including stands unaffected by the recent outbreaks (effectively serving as a control). Three fires burned forests where most attacked stands were in the red postoutbreak stage (0-2 y after beetle attack, ∼50% retention of largely red needles on beetle-killed trees) (12,14,15), considered to be most vulnerable to increased crown fire because canopy fuels are drier and more flammable (21,29). Three fires burned forests where most attacked stands were in the gray postoutbreak stage (3-10 y after beetle attack, <5% needle retention on beetle-killed trees, most beetle-killed trees still standing) (12,14,15).…”
Section: Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three fires burned forests where most attacked stands were in the red postoutbreak stage (0-2 y after beetle attack, ∼50% retention of largely red needles on beetle-killed trees) (12,14,15), considered to be most vulnerable to increased crown fire because canopy fuels are drier and more flammable (21,29). Three fires burned forests where most attacked stands were in the gray postoutbreak stage (3-10 y after beetle attack, <5% needle retention on beetle-killed trees, most beetle-killed trees still standing) (12,14,15). Gray-stage forests are considered less vulnerable to increased crown fire because canopy fuels are substantially reduced (14)(15)(16)30), although increased surface fuels from needle and branch fall could increase surface fire severity (15)(16)(17).…”
Section: Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations