2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10021-019-00470-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Microtopography on Absorptive and Transport Fine Root Biomass, Necromass, Production, Mortality and Decomposition in a Coastal Freshwater Forested Wetland, Southeastern USA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, TBCA approaches would include both topographic positions spatially, depending upon how components of the TBCA calculations are estimated [24]. However, this microtopographic differentiation in BNPP is also not a consistent result; fine root BNPP (< 2 mm) to a depth of 20 cm averaged 455 g/m 2 /year for a mixed hardwood site along the Alligator River in North Carolina, USA, with 77% of that BNPP associated with hummocks [57]. Production of absorptive roots (i.e., first and second order roots) contributed more to hummock BNPP than transport roots (i.e., third-order roots), with transport roots contributing proportionately higher to BNPP in hollows [57].…”
Section: The Role Of Bnpp In Total Ecosystem Productivity In Retreating Freshwater Forestsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, TBCA approaches would include both topographic positions spatially, depending upon how components of the TBCA calculations are estimated [24]. However, this microtopographic differentiation in BNPP is also not a consistent result; fine root BNPP (< 2 mm) to a depth of 20 cm averaged 455 g/m 2 /year for a mixed hardwood site along the Alligator River in North Carolina, USA, with 77% of that BNPP associated with hummocks [57]. Production of absorptive roots (i.e., first and second order roots) contributed more to hummock BNPP than transport roots (i.e., third-order roots), with transport roots contributing proportionately higher to BNPP in hollows [57].…”
Section: The Role Of Bnpp In Total Ecosystem Productivity In Retreating Freshwater Forestsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Live and dead AFRs and TFRs were separated according to the procedures described in Li et al (2020b). All fine roots were dried at 50 °C to a constant weight and weighed.…”
Section: Fine Root Biomass and Necromass Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AFR and TFR production, mortality and decomposition were determined using the dynamic-flow model (Li and Lange 2015;Li et al 2020b). Interval i was any given soil coring interval (1≤ i) (year).…”
Section: Dynamic-flow Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to evapoconcentration, mechanisms of increased nutrient availability in hummocks relative to hollows may be also attributed to accumulation of debris and litter (Resler and Stine, 2009) and/or higher turnover and cycling rates (Wetzel et al, 2005). Both the mass of absorptive fine roots (Li et al, 2020) and mycorrhizal activity are greater in hummocks than hollows, which may be important for P acquisition from ferric-bound particles (Cantelmo Jr. and Ehrenfeld, 1999). Overall, our finding of greater phosphorus on hummocks aligns with numerous studies where hummocks are consistently found to be zones of greater phosphorus concentrations than hollows (Jones et al, 1996;Wetzel et al, 2005;Eppinga et al, 2008).…”
Section: Controls On Soil Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%