2021
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253554
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Belowground productivity varies by assessment technique, vegetation type, and nutrient availability in tidal freshwater forested wetlands transitioning to marsh

Abstract: Wetlands along upper estuaries are characterized by dynamic transitions between forested and herbaceous communities (marsh) as salinity, hydroperiod, and nutrients change. The importance of belowground net primary productivity (BNPP) associated with fine and coarse root growth also changes but remains the dominant component of overall productivity in these important blue carbon wetlands. Appropriate BNPP assessment techniques to use in various tidal wetlands are not well-defined, and could make a difference in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(87 reference statements)
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Litterfall was found to make up 63% of total aboveground NPP (ANPP), whereas stem wood growth contributed 37% in TFFW of northeastern South Carolina (Ozalp et al, 2007). Previous TFFW productivity studies also showed that increased salinity reduced average ANPP due to the decline in average stem wood growth and litterfall (e.g., Cormier et al, 2013; Pierfelice et al, 2015), whereas belowground NPP (BNPP) did generally increase (From et al, 2021), as it did in our simulated drought.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Litterfall was found to make up 63% of total aboveground NPP (ANPP), whereas stem wood growth contributed 37% in TFFW of northeastern South Carolina (Ozalp et al, 2007). Previous TFFW productivity studies also showed that increased salinity reduced average ANPP due to the decline in average stem wood growth and litterfall (e.g., Cormier et al, 2013; Pierfelice et al, 2015), whereas belowground NPP (BNPP) did generally increase (From et al, 2021), as it did in our simulated drought.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Empirical estimates of mangrove tolerance for SLR can be sensitive to site‐specific environmental conditions, climate, assumptions about peat preservation in the reconstructions, and estimates of RSLR by the glacio‐isostatic adjustment (GIA) model. The CWEM estimate of tolerance is sensitive to assumptions of mangrove organic matter recalcitrance, root turnover (From et al., 2021), the CLSR, and boundary conditions (vertical range).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%