1994
DOI: 10.1080/02772249409358113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of metal additions on sulfate reduction activity in wastewaters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
45
3
3

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
4
45
3
3
Order By: Relevance
“…A concentration of 15 ppm can therefore be considered the maximum concentration of chromium tolerated by these anaerobic cultures. This value is below the levels obtained by Hao et al [12], who found a tolerance of 60 ppm for chromium. The difference in these values could be due to the fact that Hao et al employed enriched SRB cultures from wastewater.…”
Section: Chromium(iii)contrasting
confidence: 45%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A concentration of 15 ppm can therefore be considered the maximum concentration of chromium tolerated by these anaerobic cultures. This value is below the levels obtained by Hao et al [12], who found a tolerance of 60 ppm for chromium. The difference in these values could be due to the fact that Hao et al employed enriched SRB cultures from wastewater.…”
Section: Chromium(iii)contrasting
confidence: 45%
“…The reported toxic concentrations of heavy metals to sulphatereducing bacteria range from a few ppm (mg/L) to as much as 100 ppm [11]. Hao et al [12] studied the toxic concentrations of several heavy metals for a mixed culture of sulphate-reducing bacteria: Zn (25-40 ppm), Pb (75-80 ppm), Cu (4-20 ppm), Cd (>4-20 ppm), Ni (10-20 ppm) and Cr (60 ppm). Utgikar et al [11] reported that the effect of heavy metals on SRB can be stimulatory at lower concentrations and toxic/inhibitory at higher concentrations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, the concentration of this element in the BSR layer was already higher than the critical toxicity values, so that bacterial inhibition by this metal is not likely. The rest of metals with known toxicity for SRB were always far below the reported values for critical toxicity (e.g., 20 mg/L for Cd, 20 mg/L for Cu, 20 mg/L for Ni, 60 mg/L for Cr(III), or 75 mg/L Pb; Hao et al 1994;Utgikar et al 2001). A feasible explanation for the observed removal of dissolved sulphide at depth could be related with presence of chemical oxidants.…”
Section: Final Remarks and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Reports regarding the toxicity of heavy metals to SRB (8,10,24,27,30,39,42,46,50) have generally been qualitative in nature and have used microbial media designed to optimize growth rather than to examine metal toxicity. Often in these studies the authors reported abiotic formation of metal precipitates and/or significant metal complexation that prevented meaningful quantitative assessment of metal toxicity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%