2019
DOI: 10.1080/13416979.2019.1586300
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of managed forest versus unmanaged forest on physiological restoration from a stress stimulus, and the relationship with individual traits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
3
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The respondents at each research point can therefore not be compared directly, meaning that the differences among individuals in the two respondent groups could have caused the significant differences observed between the urban and forest environments. In future studies, this occurrence could be eliminated by exposing respondents from the two groups to both environments in reverse order [45].…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The respondents at each research point can therefore not be compared directly, meaning that the differences among individuals in the two respondent groups could have caused the significant differences observed between the urban and forest environments. In future studies, this occurrence could be eliminated by exposing respondents from the two groups to both environments in reverse order [45].…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the model of combining these theories proposed by the author, insufficient attention resources will often be an antecedent of stress and both theories involve the possibility of restoring a person from a state of fatigue or stress to an optimal state. In summary, nature, including the forest environment, has the potential to regenerate mental strength and help returning to the optimal state after experiencing stress [48].…”
Section: Nature and Human Healthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies have begun to address the relevance of forest characteristics to human health. Saito et al (2019) assessed the differences in various health variables between exposure to an unmanaged forest and a managed forest [26]. Blood pressure and saliva cortisol levels decreased significantly for both forests after a stress stimulus but records were significantly lower in the managed than the unmanaged forest [26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Saito et al (2019) assessed the differences in various health variables between exposure to an unmanaged forest and a managed forest [26]. Blood pressure and saliva cortisol levels decreased significantly for both forests after a stress stimulus but records were significantly lower in the managed than the unmanaged forest [26]. Another study reported that health responses differed between an unmanaged and a managed forest, with significantly more favorable acute insulin reactions and levels of oxidative stress in the unmanaged forest, underlying more profound beneficial effects in the unmanaged than the managed forest [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%