1971
DOI: 10.1007/bf00384868
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of light quality on apical dominance in Xanthium strumarium and the associated changes in endogenous levels of abscisic acid and cytokinins

Abstract: Apical dominance in Xanthium strumarium was influenced by the quality of illumination received at the end of the photoperiod. The involvement of the red/far-red regions of the spectrum was apparent. The persistence of the effects was partially dependent on the age of the individual buds concerned. Plants receiving 30 minutes of illumination from tungsten lamps after a 16-hour photoperiod from fluorescent tubes failed to branch, whereas plants given an identical photoperiod, both in terms of day-length and phot… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
30
1

Year Published

1972
1972
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
4
30
1
Order By: Relevance
“…R and FR irradiation at the end-of-day, can also influence apical dominance (19, 3 1). levels of auxins, cytokinins and ABA (10,13,31), alkaloids, soluble phenols (30), free sugars and organic acids (18). Furthermore, far red light at the end of a long day may stimulate floral initiation in some short day plants (3,5,8,16).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…R and FR irradiation at the end-of-day, can also influence apical dominance (19, 3 1). levels of auxins, cytokinins and ABA (10,13,31), alkaloids, soluble phenols (30), free sugars and organic acids (18). Furthermore, far red light at the end of a long day may stimulate floral initiation in some short day plants (3,5,8,16).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ABA levels in dormant axillary buds of a variety of species have been observed to decrease in response to decapitation of the main shoot (Knox and Wareing, 1984;Gocal et al, 1991;Mader et al, 2003) and in response to fruit removal, a treatment that also promoted bud outgrowth (Tamas et al, 1979). Additionally, early work investigating the regulation of branching by the R:FR in Xanthium strumarium and tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) suggested that low R:FR promoted ABA accumulation while high R:FR reduced ABA levels and also permitted bud outgrowth (Tucker and Mansfield, 1972;Tucker, 1977). Although elevated ABA levels have often been shown to be associated with bud dormancy, there is little evidence demonstrating a direct role of endogenous ABA in regulating bud outgrowth in intact plants.…”
Section: Aba Is a Regulator Of Branching And Bud Responses To The R:frmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies using a wide variety of species showed that ABA abundance in buds negatively correlated with bud activity (Tucker and Mansfield, 1971;Tucker, 1977;Tamas et al, 1979;Knox and Wareing, 1984;Gocal et al, 1991;Mader et al, 2003). Exogenous ABA inhibited bud growth in pea (Arney and Mitchell, 1969), Arabidopsis (Chatfield et al, 2000), Ipomoea nil (Cline and Oh, 2006), and tomato (Solanum lycopersicum; Cline and Oh, 2006), while the carotenoid (and ABA) biosynthesis inhibitor fluridone promoted bud growth in Rosa hybrida (Le Bris et al, 1999).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%