1971
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3180.1971.tb00992.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EFFECTS OF LIGHT INTENSITY, PHOTOPERIOD AND NITROGEN ON THE GROWTH OF SEEDLINGS OF AGROPYRON REPENS (L.) BEAUV. AND AGROSTIS GIGANTEA ROTH

Abstract: Seedlings of Agropyron repens (L.) Beauv. and Agrostis gigantea Roth were grown in two light intensities with two photoperiods and with two amounts of nitrogen. On two occasions plants were also transferred between photoperiods.The early growtJi of the seedlings was increased most by increasing the light intensity, but later nitrogen had the greatest effect. In short photoperiods, plants of both species were decumbent and had many more shoots than in long photoperiods. At the end of the experiment, plants of b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
1

Year Published

1977
1977
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(5 reference statements)
1
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results, similarly to Williams (1971), indicate that light has a relatively strong and early effect on E. repens biomass acquisition, allocation and morphological traits such as tillering, while the effect of reduced nutrient supply on E. repens biomass acquisition appears later and is most pronounced when light is not limited. Although single resource studies cannot be used for direct comparisons between limitations of different resources, this pattern is seemingly confirmed by studies on the effect of either nutrient supply (McIntyre, 1965;Turner, 1966) or light supply (Williams, 1970;Skuterud, 1984) on E. repens biomass allocation and acquisition.…”
Section: Light and Nutrient Limitationssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results, similarly to Williams (1971), indicate that light has a relatively strong and early effect on E. repens biomass acquisition, allocation and morphological traits such as tillering, while the effect of reduced nutrient supply on E. repens biomass acquisition appears later and is most pronounced when light is not limited. Although single resource studies cannot be used for direct comparisons between limitations of different resources, this pattern is seemingly confirmed by studies on the effect of either nutrient supply (McIntyre, 1965;Turner, 1966) or light supply (Williams, 1970;Skuterud, 1984) on E. repens biomass allocation and acquisition.…”
Section: Light and Nutrient Limitationssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The primary mode of resource competition may also be important in determining how efficiently E. repens is suppressed in systems with under-sown companion crops. A number of studies have investigated the effects of resource limitation on E. repens and, at least in regards to limited nutrient and light, the rhizome biomass allocation appears to follow the same pattern as the root biomass (McIntyre, 1965;Williams, 1970Williams, , 1971Skuterud, 1984). Thus, crops that compete heavily for light should have an especially high suppression rate as they would not only lower biomass acquisition, but also change the E. repens allocation away from rhizome production.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean DMY across the 3 yr increased by 64, 95 and 105% at the corresponding N rates. Fertilizer N has been observed to increase the number of tillers and buds for quackgrass and its biomass (Tardif and Leroux 1992) and also increased the ratio of aboveground to underground biomass (McIntyre 1971;Williams 1971). In a large field study, application of N has increased shoot dry weight and decreased rhizome dry weight of quackgrass (Bandeen and Buchholtz 1967).…”
Section: Experiments 2 Fertilizer N Effects On Forage Yield and Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beauv. ) and Williams (1971) (Sharma et al 1976 In our experiments, the growth of wild oats was adversely affected by soil acidity (pH below 7.5). However, the ability of wild oats to withstand more acid soil conditions than wheat or barley has been reported (Thurston 196l …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%