2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-020-06039-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of key parameters on magnetic pulse welding of 5A02 tube and SS304 tube

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies on the EMW of titanium to other metals are scarce, nevertheless. Attempts were made by Yu et al [10] to identify the ideal welding circumstances for the EMW of 5A02 tube and SS304. According to Roshith et al [11], underwater shockwaves were used to fuse titanium and magnesium explosively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies on the EMW of titanium to other metals are scarce, nevertheless. Attempts were made by Yu et al [10] to identify the ideal welding circumstances for the EMW of 5A02 tube and SS304. According to Roshith et al [11], underwater shockwaves were used to fuse titanium and magnesium explosively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This process can easily replace the high energy density processes like laser beam welding, electron beam welding and plasma arc welding due to its lesser capital cost. Pulsed heating and induction heating can help to reduce the deflection (Yu et al ., 2020). The effect of heating current on various process parameters was studied; the mode of heating current has also a major influence on the increase of the deposition rate (Olivares and Díaz, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The flyer impact velocity governs the nature of the collision between the parts and the consequent rupture and jetting out of the surface impurities, and the visco-plastic deformation and coalescence of the clean metallic interfaces [14,15]. For MPW of aluminum alloy tubes with steel [11,16,17] and with copper [18] target tubes with wall thicknesses from 0.8 to 1.0 mm, the flyer impact velocity was reported in the range of 140 to 363 m/s. Likewise, the flyer impact velocity was reported in the range of 240 to 458 m/s for MPW of sheets for similar materials such as aluminum alloys [19,20] and for dissimilar materials such as aluminum and steel [21,22], and aluminum and copper [23,24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thickness of the sheets was in the range of 1 to 2.5 mm. An increase of the flyer impact velocity for an increased discharge energy [17][18][19][20][21][22] and the stand-off distance [17,19,22] is also reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%