1990
DOI: 10.1016/0026-0495(90)90025-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of intraperitoneal versus subcutaneous insulin administration on lipoprotein metabolism in type I diabetes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

4
18
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
4
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…31 That virtually the same HbA]C and integrated 24-hour blood glucose levels observed after ISC were maintained with the same total dose of insulin given by IP delivery despite a substantial reduction in circulating insulin levels is consistent with the occurrence of normal hepatic extraction of insulin.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…31 That virtually the same HbA]C and integrated 24-hour blood glucose levels observed after ISC were maintained with the same total dose of insulin given by IP delivery despite a substantial reduction in circulating insulin levels is consistent with the occurrence of normal hepatic extraction of insulin.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…In type 2 diabetes insulin appears unable to inhibit acutely the release of VLDL1 from the liver, despite efficient suppression of serum NEFA [23]. However, the decrease in circulating VLDL particles following acute insulin action in insulin sensitive individuals appears to be the result not only of a decreased hepatic production [24], but also an increased clearance.…”
Section: Elevated Fasting Triglyceridesmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Experiments in diabetic dogs have demonstrated that intraperitoneal insulin is almost entirely absorbed by the portal circulation (19). Reported changes in lipoprotein concentration and composition in IDDM patients treated with intraperitoneal insulin (20)(21)(22)(23)(24), however, have been contradictory; this may be attributable to the many intrinsic differences of patients, like different degrees of glucose control and different duration of follow-up.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%