2004
DOI: 10.1038/sj.gt.3302296
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of intramyocardial pVEGF165 delivery on regional myocardial blood flow: evidence for a spatial ‘delivery–efficacy’ mismatch

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dosing we used was 5-10Â that was used in previous studies. 29,30 Furthermore, the injectate concentration and volume clearly modulate myocardial gene expression and need to be carefully accounted for in future trials. We also invoked an RU5 enhancer element to increase peak gene expression which significantly increased the biological effect observed in early rodent studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dosing we used was 5-10Â that was used in previous studies. 29,30 Furthermore, the injectate concentration and volume clearly modulate myocardial gene expression and need to be carefully accounted for in future trials. We also invoked an RU5 enhancer element to increase peak gene expression which significantly increased the biological effect observed in early rodent studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical trials using adenoviral delivery of VEGF121 in human patients with limb ischemia (72) indicate that local adenovirus injection is well tolerated and safe. Nonviral methods of angiogenic growth factor delivery have also been investigated, and delivery of a plasmid‐encoding VEGF165 was found to improve perfusion and myocardial function in a porcine chronic myocardial ischemia model (89). In another study, bolus injection of a plasmid‐encoding platelet‐derived growth factor did not significantly affect tissue formation, whereas sustained plasmid delivery from a polymer enhanced blood vessel formation (103).…”
Section: Delivery Of Angiogenic Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,29,30 However, because the molecular studies were performed at a single time point, 7 weeks after ameroid placement, it is likely that many of the acute changes in angiogenic mediators in response to chronic ischemia are not captured in this model. Additionally, morphometric assessment of new vessel formation by quantification of CD31 ϩ endothelial cells leads inevitably to the identification of all vessels, which may include newly formed, leaky, and unstable capillaries that may not be capable of improving myocardial perfusion.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%