1990
DOI: 10.1016/0038-1098(90)90627-n
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of intergrain and intragrain currents on flux profile in granular superconducting ceramics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The critical currents were deduced by the AC Campbell method which is based on the flux profile acquisition. [13][14][15][16] By measuring the AC flux entering the sample, it was possible to obtain the field flux profile as a function of the AC field amplitude assuming the Bean model from which intragrain and/or intergrain currents can be deduced. [13,14] This can be done following some generalization towards granular materials, beyond the original homogeneity hypothesis.…”
Section: Electrical and Magnetic Investigations Of The Intragranular mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The critical currents were deduced by the AC Campbell method which is based on the flux profile acquisition. [13][14][15][16] By measuring the AC flux entering the sample, it was possible to obtain the field flux profile as a function of the AC field amplitude assuming the Bean model from which intragrain and/or intergrain currents can be deduced. [13,14] This can be done following some generalization towards granular materials, beyond the original homogeneity hypothesis.…”
Section: Electrical and Magnetic Investigations Of The Intragranular mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because λ is not negligible with respect to the mean grain radius, the grain proportion is then underestimated. Following a Bean model generalization [14], the slope of the flux profiles at low field amplitudes is proportional to the intergranular current density J c . Experimental data (figure 7) clearly show that J c is strongly affected by the applied DC magnetic field.…”
Section: Campbell-rollins Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually a shoulder is predicted when weak links are present. This shoulder generally allows to deduce both intergranular (J cj ) and intragranular (J cg ) critical current densities from the slopes of the flux profile on both sides of the shoulder [4][5][6]. This is not the case here, where flux profiles are rather linear.…”
Section: Flux Profilesmentioning
confidence: 97%