2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2004.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of intercropping and nitrogen application on nitrate present in the profile of an Orthic Anthrosol in Northwest China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
35
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
4
35
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Because soil nitrification potential is positively correlated with both archaeal and bacterial amoA abundance (Sims et al, 2012;Song et al, 2010), the decreased abundance of ammonia-oxidizers in the intercropping and rhizobial inoculation treatments may be the explanation why intercropping can reduce nitrate leaching in soil (Whitmore and Schröder, 2007). Because it has been reported that the intercropping of cereals with legumes can reduce the nitrate but not ammonia accumulation (Huang et al, 2011;Li et al, 2005;Whitmore and Schröder, 2007), the decreased abundance of ammonia-oxidizers in the rhizosphere cannot be related to the reduction of ammonium concentration, so the real explanation for this decrease needs further study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because soil nitrification potential is positively correlated with both archaeal and bacterial amoA abundance (Sims et al, 2012;Song et al, 2010), the decreased abundance of ammonia-oxidizers in the intercropping and rhizobial inoculation treatments may be the explanation why intercropping can reduce nitrate leaching in soil (Whitmore and Schröder, 2007). Because it has been reported that the intercropping of cereals with legumes can reduce the nitrate but not ammonia accumulation (Huang et al, 2011;Li et al, 2005;Whitmore and Schröder, 2007), the decreased abundance of ammonia-oxidizers in the rhizosphere cannot be related to the reduction of ammonium concentration, so the real explanation for this decrease needs further study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And for N210, the reasons might be both. Some studies showed that the yield had little response to N fertilization (Basso & Ritchie 2005, Li et al 2005. The difference may be a result of the disparity of initial soil NO 3 --N contents in different studies.…”
Section: N Uptake Dry Matter Production and Grain Yieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the use of N fertilizer has increased dramatically in recent years (China Agricultural Yearbook 2001;FAOSTAT 2002). A number of investigations have been conducted in northern China to study loss and accumulation of NO 3 -N in the soil profiles under dryland farming systems (Yuan et al 2000;Fan et al 2000Gu et al 2003;Ju et al 2003Ju et al , 2004Liu et al 2003Liu et al , 2004Li et al 2003Li et al , 2005Wu et al 2003Wu et al , 2005. However, most of the reports have been published in Chinese with a short abstract in English, and do not provide enough information to international researchers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%