2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2006.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of insemination–ovulation interval on fertilization rates and embryo characteristics in dairy cattle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
68
3
16

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
4
68
3
16
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, the overall time elapsed from estrous onset to ovulation was higher to those reported in other studies in dairy and beef cattle, for which time from estrous onset to ovulation was up to 32.9 h (Wiltbank et al, 1967) or averaged 20-30 h (Roelofs et al, 2006;Peter et al, 2009), while in averaged 24.4 h in other Bos species (Bos frontalis; Mondal et al, 2006) Although synchronization in this study did have an effect on the subsequent ovulation timing, similar ovulation times have been reported between PGF2α-induced and spontaneous estrous (Cárdenas et al, 1991;Pinheiro et al, 1998). The longer time from onset of synchronized to ovulation, when compared to the spontaneous estrous may be due to incomplete luteolysis after PGF2α or interference of the hormone protocol with follicular dynamics (Drillich et al, 2000).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 85%
“…In the present study, the overall time elapsed from estrous onset to ovulation was higher to those reported in other studies in dairy and beef cattle, for which time from estrous onset to ovulation was up to 32.9 h (Wiltbank et al, 1967) or averaged 20-30 h (Roelofs et al, 2006;Peter et al, 2009), while in averaged 24.4 h in other Bos species (Bos frontalis; Mondal et al, 2006) Although synchronization in this study did have an effect on the subsequent ovulation timing, similar ovulation times have been reported between PGF2α-induced and spontaneous estrous (Cárdenas et al, 1991;Pinheiro et al, 1998). The longer time from onset of synchronized to ovulation, when compared to the spontaneous estrous may be due to incomplete luteolysis after PGF2α or interference of the hormone protocol with follicular dynamics (Drillich et al, 2000).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 85%
“…This may initially seem appropriate because it allows for the 6 to 8 h required for the sustained phase of sperm transport to the site of fertilization and sperm capacitation (Hunter and Wilmut, 1983;Wilmut and Hunter, 1984), however, the degree of variation in the AI to ovulation interval is a major concern for pregnancy outcomes to AI based on activity. Overall, 21% of cows received AI between 0 and 12 h after ovulation (Figure 4), a timing associated with low fertilization rates and embryo quality in lactating dairy cows (Roelofs et al, 2006), possibly due to aging of the oocyte. By contrast, only one cow was inseminated more than 24 h before ovulation (Figure 4), a period that results in high fertilization rates but low embryo quality, possibly due to aging of spermatozoa (Roelofs et al, 2006).…”
Section: Timing Of Ai Relative To Behavioral Estrusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, 21% of cows received AI between 0 and 12 h after ovulation (Figure 4), a timing associated with low fertilization rates and embryo quality in lactating dairy cows (Roelofs et al, 2006), possibly due to aging of the oocyte. By contrast, only one cow was inseminated more than 24 h before ovulation (Figure 4), a period that results in high fertilization rates but low embryo quality, possibly due to aging of spermatozoa (Roelofs et al, 2006). Based on data from Valenza et al (2012), it may be beneficial to either reduce the variation in the AI to ovulation interval so that more cows are inseminated at the optimal time in relation to ovulation, or alternatively, to inseminate cows a few hours earlier to reduce the probability of Figure 2 Observed prevalence of anovulation (bars) and number of cows (line) by body condition score category.…”
Section: Timing Of Ai Relative To Behavioral Estrusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bartolome et al (2004) No caso das novilhas que apresentaram ovulação antes da inseminação (FD ovulatórios em D11), também não houve diferenças quando relacionadas com a taxa de gestação. Roelofs et al (2006) e Dalton e Saacke (2007) sugeriram que, para melhorar os índices de prenhezes, a IA deve ser realizada próximo ao momento da ovulação (aproximadamente 30 horas após o início do cio), mas preferencialmente anterior a ela, para impedir que o oócito envelheça e permitir a melhoria da disponibilidade espermática para fecundação.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified