2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchar.2019.03.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of initial microstructure on hot deformation behavior of Al-7.9Zn-2.7Mg-2.0Cu (wt%) alloy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, it can be seen from Figure 8 that a large number of near micrometer-sized second-phase particles are precipitated during the air cooling after homogenization, which potentially may act as nucleation sites for recrystallization through the accumulated stored energy in their immediate vicinity, and hence being potent nucleation sites for recrystallization (i.e., particle-stimulated nucleation (PSN) of recrystallization). [21][22][23][24] However, the effect of these second-phase particles for possible differences in the recrystallization behavior can be ignored in this study because there is no obvious difference between these two alloys with respect to the size and number density of these second-phase particles. Moreover, the particles size of almost all of the second-phase particles in Figure 8 is less than 1 lm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, it can be seen from Figure 8 that a large number of near micrometer-sized second-phase particles are precipitated during the air cooling after homogenization, which potentially may act as nucleation sites for recrystallization through the accumulated stored energy in their immediate vicinity, and hence being potent nucleation sites for recrystallization (i.e., particle-stimulated nucleation (PSN) of recrystallization). [21][22][23][24] However, the effect of these second-phase particles for possible differences in the recrystallization behavior can be ignored in this study because there is no obvious difference between these two alloys with respect to the size and number density of these second-phase particles. Moreover, the particles size of almost all of the second-phase particles in Figure 8 is less than 1 lm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the lnZ value of 25.8, the local misorientation and cumulative misorientations along the black vector of Figure 9 b are shown in Figure 10 b. The cumulative misorientations along the vector increase continuously and exceed 12°, which suggests that progressive subgrain rotation has been developed from the grain center to grain boundary [ 39 , 40 ]. When lnZ value reaches 21.7, the adjacent grains and subgrains are separated by low-misorientation grain boundaries, as shown by the black circle in Figure 9 c. This phenomenon is suggested to result from the division of original grains, as recrystallization occurring with the dislocation density and grain misorientation rising.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zang et al discussed the effect of initial microstructure on the hot deformation behavior of Al-Zn-Mg-Cu alloy. However, strain compensation was not considered in developing the constitutive model [23]. Despite the progress achieved in the abovementioned studies in exploring the flow behavior and recrystallization mechanism of Al-Zn-Mg-Cu alloys, few studies have focused on the hot deformation behavior considering strain effects and discussed the relationship between the second phase and the microstructural evolution in detail.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%