2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.2008.00335.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of increasing days of exposure to prepartum transition diets on milk production and milk composition in dairy cows

Abstract: Increasing exposure to prepartum transition diets increased milk and milk-protein yields and decreased the milk fat-percentage, but not the milk-protein percentage or milk-fat yield.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
38
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
2
38
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Bachman (2002) and Gulay et al (2003) have reported no loss with dry periods < 60 d. Sample sizes in both of those studies were small, however, and it has been shown (Kuhn & Hutchison, 2005) that even estimates in the wrong direction are not unlikely with such small sample sizes. On the other hand, an increase in yields of milk and protein and a decrease in milk fat content with an elongation of the dry period were recorded by Degaris et al (2008). Also consistent with us, Kuhn et al (2005aKuhn et al ( , 2007 cows.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Bachman (2002) and Gulay et al (2003) have reported no loss with dry periods < 60 d. Sample sizes in both of those studies were small, however, and it has been shown (Kuhn & Hutchison, 2005) that even estimates in the wrong direction are not unlikely with such small sample sizes. On the other hand, an increase in yields of milk and protein and a decrease in milk fat content with an elongation of the dry period were recorded by Degaris et al (2008). Also consistent with us, Kuhn et al (2005aKuhn et al ( , 2007 cows.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…There are many examples of observational epidemiological study designs that provide useful evidence of disease or reproduction that include case-control studies (Davis et al, 1980), and cohort studies (Curtis et al,1984;Degaris et al, 2008). We recommend, in general, that the evidential base used in a meta-analysis consist of randomized controlled clinical studies or prospective cohort studies as these should provide the most rigorous data.…”
Section: Evidence In Animal Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Full details of sample size calculations, animals and management, experimental design and diets and data collection are provided elsewhere 15 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%