Effects of increased flow in the main stem of the River Rhine on the invertebrate communities of its tributaries

Abstract

1. We hypothesised that increased flow in the main stem of the River Rhine would influence the invertebrate communities of its tributaries and therefore investigated the invertebrate fauna of six tributaries over 2 years. 2. We collected quantitative invertebrate samples at three sites in each tributary: in the tributary mouth (influenced by Rhine water whenever flow in the Rhine exceeded mean annual level), in the zone reached by average floods (return period 1.5 years) in the Rhine (average flood level sites), and immediately upstream of the range of extreme Rhine floods (reference sites). Samples were taken in spring, summer and autumn of each year, at different flow levels of the Rhine. We also compared substratum composition at the three sites. 3. Tributary mouth sites had the finest substratum, the lowest total invertebrate density and the lowest taxon richness. At average flood level and reference sites, these three parameters were similar. 4. Taxa known to prefer larger rivers were mostly confined to the tributary mouth sites, and species preferring upland streams dominated at the average flood level and reference sites. 5. Multivariate analyses confirmed the influence of the Rhine on the tributary mouth sites. Invasive invertebrate species, which usually appear only in the Rhine itself, were found at the tributary mouth sites but not further up in the tributaries. 6. Our study shows that increased flow in the main stem of the Rhine influenced substratum composition and invertebrate communities at the tributary mouth sites. These results imply that the relationship between the main stem of a river and its tributaries is not one-way (from tributary to main stem), but rather a two-way interaction.

Spring Diatom Blooming Phases in a Representative Eutrophic Bay of the Three-Gorges Reservoir, China

“…If the between-subjects effects of ANOVAs were significant, we performed multiple comparisons among bloom phases. These comparisons were carried out following the procedure of Beckmann et al (2005). In short, Tukey's honestly significant difference (HSD) post hoc tests were performed, except in cases of persistent heteroscedasticity where we performed Games-Howell tests.…”

Can excluding non-insect taxa from stream macroinvertebrate surveys enhance the sensitivity of taxonomic distinctness indices to human disturbance?

“…These comparisons were carried out with Tukey's honestly significant difference (HSD) post hoc tests. In cases of persistent heteroscedasticity (results of Levene's test significant), we performed Games-Howell tests which do not assume equal variances between groups (Beckmann et al, 2005).…”

Longitudinal patterns of macroinvertebrate communities in relation to environmental factors in a Tibetan-Plateau river system

“…These comparisons were carried out with Tukey's honestly significant difference (HSD) post hoc tests. In the cases of persistent heteroscedasticity (results of Levene's test significant), GameseHowell tests which do not assume equal variances between groups (Beckmann et al, 2005) were performed. All ANOVAs were made using SPSS statistical programs (version 13.0).…”