2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116636
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of hydrothermal treatment on physico-chemcial structures and liquefaction behaviors of lignite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At a low modification temperature, the decomposition of coal was dominant, and the abundant bridge bonds and alkyl side-chain structures in coal were broken, thereby reducing the aliphatic structure. However, with the increase in the modification temperature, the water–gas shift reaction was promoted and a large amount of active hydrogen were generated, thereby enhancing hydrogenation and stabilizing more hydrocarbon radicals, leading to the increase in the aliphatic structure. , SEM analysis results reveal that the CNT content of C-M 280 is higher than that of C-RC, while the content of aliphatic carbon in M 280 is significantly less than that of RC; hence, aliphatic carbon may not be the main carbon source precursors for CNT generation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At a low modification temperature, the decomposition of coal was dominant, and the abundant bridge bonds and alkyl side-chain structures in coal were broken, thereby reducing the aliphatic structure. However, with the increase in the modification temperature, the water–gas shift reaction was promoted and a large amount of active hydrogen were generated, thereby enhancing hydrogenation and stabilizing more hydrocarbon radicals, leading to the increase in the aliphatic structure. , SEM analysis results reveal that the CNT content of C-M 280 is higher than that of C-RC, while the content of aliphatic carbon in M 280 is significantly less than that of RC; hence, aliphatic carbon may not be the main carbon source precursors for CNT generation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hydromodification of coal in a subcritical-CO system is an important method for tuning the structure and property of coal . In this system, the original cross-links of coal would be broken and a large quantity of active hydrogen is generated by water gas shift reaction, which improves the mobility of radical fragments and promotes the reconstruction of molecules. It is anticipated that this system could be employed to tailor the coal structure into active precursors. However, little research has so far been dedicated to explore whether and how the hydromodification of coal affects the growth of CNTs in carbon composites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among thermochemical processes capable of upgrading waste and low-value materials, hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) is a technology that can accommodate a variety of wet and dry feedstocks into an energy-dense product . The potential of the HTL process has been demonstrated in the valorization of renewable waste feedstocks, such as algae, sewage sludges, lignocellulosic wastes, and non-renewable low-value matter, for example, low-grade coal. In this latter case, before combustion for electricity combustion, lignite can be converted by HTL to increase the HHV on one side and get an oil crude compatible for fuel production on the other side.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The process enables an improvement in the slurry properties of coal (Yu et al 2012;Fu and Wang 2014;Zhang et al 2018) and can reduce the viscosity of the coal-water slurry. Moreover, hydrothermal treatment not only promotes the hydro-liquefaction activity during coal liquefaction (Li et al 2020) but also increases the coal concentration of the coal-solvent slurry (Inoue et al 2012a, b), which is because of the lower porosity for the treated coal. Furthermore, hydrothermally treated lignite has a greater calorific value (Yu et al 2014;Ullah et al 2018) compared with raw lignite.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%