Effects of Human Colonization on the Abundance and Diversity of Mammals in Eastern Brazilian Amazonia

Abstract

With its long history of colonization, eastern Amazonia has the highest population density in Brazilian Amazonia and represents the typical pattern of recent human occupation. Between 1991 and1995, we surveyed the mammalian fauna at five sites, representing different degrees of human disturbance. We used line transects (1511 km surveyed) to describe differences in diversity and abundance at each site and to evaluate the effects of environmental factors. Twenty-two of the expected 44 species were recorded during surveys, but no more than 18 were recorded at any one site, and only 3 species were observed at all five sites. Despite a minimum transect length of 202 km, most species were recorded relatively infrequently at all sites, although overall sighting rates at different sites varied by more than 100%. Between-site differences were even more pronounced when we compared specific groups (e.g., arboreal, terrestrial, game, nongame), reflecting the differential effects of factors such as hunting, logging, and forest clearing. In general terms, species diversity, abundance, total biomass, and mean biomass all tended to decrease with increasing human disturbance. Two more specific patterns were also distinguished: decreasing abundance and biomass of game species with increasing hunting pressure and increasing abundance of nongame species with increasing forest disturbance. Intense hunting pressure alone may have deleterious short-term effects on abundance, but not necessarily on diversity, whereas prolonged hunting pressure, combined with forest clearing, results in marked distortions in the mammalian community. Overall, the study emphasizes the relative paucity of the mammalian fauna of eastern Amazonia, in terms of both species diversity and abundance, and its vulnerability to the ongoing process of human colonization in the region. Efectos de la Colonización Humana en la Abundancia y Diversidad de Mamíferos en la Zona Oriental del Amazonas BrasileñoResumen: Con su larga historia de colonización, la zona oriental del Amazonas tiene la población más densa de la región del Amazonas brasileño y representa el patrón típico de ocupación humana reciente. Entre 1991 y 1995 muestreamos la fauna de mamíferos en cinco sitios representativos de diferentes grados de perturbación humana. Utilizamos transectos en línea (1511 km muestreados) para describir las diferencias en diversidad y abundancia en cada sitio y para evaluar los efectos de los factores ambientales. Veintidós de las 44 especies esperadas fueron observadas durante los muestreos, pero no más de 18 fueron observadas en un solo sitio, y solo tres especies fueron observadas en los cinco sitios. No obstante la longitud mínima de transecto de 202 km, la mayoría de las especies fueron relativamente poco frecuentes en todos los sitios, pese a que las tasas de avistamiento en diferentes sitios varió en más de un 100%. Las diferencias entre sitios fueron aún mas pronunciadas cuando se compararon grupos de especies (por ejemplo, arbóreas, terrestres, cinegéticas, no cinegé...

Dietary breadth of the animal protein consumed by riverine communities in the Tapajós National Forest, Brazil

“…This community is also more recent and more isolated than the others, which may mean that local game populations may be less impacted than those at other sites, a pattern observed throughout the Neotropics (Lopes & Ferrari 2000, Peres 2000, Jerozolimski & Peres 2003. This also suggests that game may be preferred over fish, in general, and that the prevalence of fish in the diets of the other communities is the result of the relative scarcity of game at these sites.…”

Biogeographical patterns of the diet of Palearctic badger: Is badger an earthworm specialist predator?

“…Human activities lead to wildlife habitat fragmentation and transformation [41]. Researchers have revealed the abundance of species decreases as human activity increases [42,43]. Species diversity and abundance vary distinctly between different habitats, especially for insects [44].…”

Company–Community Logging Contracts in Amazonian Settlements: Impacts on Livelihoods and NTFP Harvests

“…Studies of the impacts of hunting pressure on game populations show significant decreases in populations of many species in community forests (Peres 2000, Peres andLake 2003). The effects of hunting are likely to be greater than that of logging (Lopes andFerrari 2000, Peres andLake 2003). As the presence of loggers often increases hunting pressure because of the construction of roads (Wilkie et al 2000), it is important to begin to decouple the effects of hunting and logging.…”