2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2013.04.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of habit on intentional and reactive motivations for unhealthy eating

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings are consistent with those by Ohtomo (2013) who reported that unhealthy snacking behavior was predicted more strongly by willingness to engage in such a behavior than by behavioral intention.…”
Section: Practical Implicationssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These findings are consistent with those by Ohtomo (2013) who reported that unhealthy snacking behavior was predicted more strongly by willingness to engage in such a behavior than by behavioral intention.…”
Section: Practical Implicationssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Despite this suggestive evidence, there is only one known healthy eating study using both concepts together (Ohtomo, 2013). One possible reason for this is that the concept of behavioral willingness comes from the prototype/willingness model, which has been used to predict healthrisk behaviors (e.g., smoking, binge drinking), not health-promoting behaviors.…”
Section: Behavioral Intentions Vs Behavioral Willingnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whilst these models have been useful in identifying predictors of snacking which may be successfully targeted via intervention and health information (see Branscum & Sharma;Mesters & Oostveen;1994, Lally, Bartle, & Wardle;, Robinson, Harris, Thomas, Aveyard, & Higgs, 2013Shojaeezadeh, 2010), they have tended to neglect aspects of behaviour which are unplanned or non-reflective in nature. For snacking behaviour in particular, it is likely that non-reflective variables play a large role in determining action (Hofmann, Freise, & Strack, 2009;Ohtomo, 2013). Indeed, dual-process models confirm that snacking behaviour is predicted by both reflective and nonreflective processes (Churchill & Jessop, 2011;Honkanen, Olsen, Verplanken, & Tuu, 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such instruments provide medical services free from the limitations of time and location, and have had a positive role in clinical treatment of disease [13,[22][23][24]. However, a person's diet is affected by many elements such as region, culture, habits, preference, and even psychology [11,[25][26][27]. Therefore, a lack of monitoring tools has resulted in a situation where the status of dietary health among various populations remains largely unknown in the public health landscape.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%