1996
DOI: 10.2172/204225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of grit roughness and pitch oscillations on the S801 airfoil

Abstract: Angle of attack Alternating current Model chord length Drag coefficient Minimum drag coefficient Pressure drag coefficient Wake drag coefficient Uncorrected drag coefficient Lift coefficient Maximum lift coefficient Lift coefficient at angle of maximum lift, but with angle of attack decreasing Uncorrected lift coefficient Pitching moment coefficient about the quarter chord Pitching moment coefficient at angle of maximum lift, but with angle of attack decreasing Pitching moment coefficient at angle of maximum l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mid-series airfoils were experimentally validated at The Ohio State University [22]. Grit with a k c = 0.0019 was attached in a distinct pattern of varying distribution based on measured wind turbine roughness, where k was the roughness height and c was the model chord.…”
Section: Ic Historical Airfoil Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mid-series airfoils were experimentally validated at The Ohio State University [22]. Grit with a k c = 0.0019 was attached in a distinct pattern of varying distribution based on measured wind turbine roughness, where k was the roughness height and c was the model chord.…”
Section: Ic Historical Airfoil Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For DU 93‐W‐210 and DU 91‐W2–250, the experimental data at angles of attack between −10 and 20° are used, and the data at other angles of attack are computed through AirfoilPrep.xls , which is a simple tool from NREL. The aerodynamic results of five airfoils (S801, S810, S813, S815, S825) under different Reynolds numbers are adopted, too. These data are obtained for airfoils under clean and roughness conditions and then expanded to large angles of attack by AirfoilPrep.xls .…”
Section: Modified Fixed Point Iterative Methods and Performance Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 5. Airfoils response reconstruction in comparison with the experimental data for S801 airfoil (Ramsay et al, 1996) applying only the first order correction and with inclusion of the second order term. (a) Lift, (b) drag and (c) pitching moment.…”
Section: Second Order Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This onset may result in a significant drop of the lift coefficient (C L ) and can be dangerous for the blade structure itself. (Ramsay et al, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%