2001
DOI: 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(01)74667-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Grain Processing, Forage to Concentrate Ratio, and Forage Particle Size on Rumen pH and Digestion by Dairy Cows

Abstract: Dietary factors that alter the intake of effective fiber were evaluated for their effects on rumen fermentation, digestion, and milk production using a double 4 x 4 quasi-Latin square design with a 2(3) factorial arrangement of treatments. The dietary factors were extent of barley grain processing, coarse (1.60 mm) or flat (1.36 mm); forage-to-concentrate (F:C) ratio, low (35:65) or high (55:45) (dry matter basis); and forage particle length, long (7.59 mm) or short (6.08 mm). Eight lactating cows with ruminal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

38
186
10
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 181 publications
(235 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
38
186
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, feeding more rapidly digested starch sources such as wheat can cause a depression in ruminal pH and may lead to a reduction in DM intake (Grant, 1994). In the current study, despite starch intake increasing from approximately 1 kg/ day on W-0 to 4.6 kg/day on W-75, forage DM intake increased, although the highest level of starch intake recorded here was substantially lower than that reported in other studies (Overton et al, 1995;Yang et al, 2001).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…In general, feeding more rapidly digested starch sources such as wheat can cause a depression in ruminal pH and may lead to a reduction in DM intake (Grant, 1994). In the current study, despite starch intake increasing from approximately 1 kg/ day on W-0 to 4.6 kg/day on W-75, forage DM intake increased, although the highest level of starch intake recorded here was substantially lower than that reported in other studies (Overton et al, 1995;Yang et al, 2001).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…However, the forage to concentrate ratio and DMI differed among diets. These factors are both negatively related to nutrient digestion [38] and, on the contrary to experiment 1, influenced digestibility measurements as well as the protein source. Similar nutrient digestibility in dairy cows receiving mixed diets with lupin or soybean meal as protein source were reported by Singh et al [35] where the forage to concentrate ratio, DM and CP intake did not differ.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to experiment 1, milk fat percentage was depressed with the lupin diet. This could be due to lower forage to concentrate ratios of lupinbased diets [38], inducing a modification of the rumen volatile fatty acid synthesis. However, milk fat depression was less pronounced with the lupin/pea diet.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It causes a greater ruminal digestion of starch with greater benefits in the diet (Yang et al, 2001;Zinn et al, 2002). The percentage of residual fecal starch was not influenced by supplementation with exogenous amylolytic enzymes of the treatments amylase and compound (Table 4).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%