2015
DOI: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v37i2.26446
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<b>Performance of beef cattle bulls in feed lots and fed on diets containing enzymatic complex

Abstract: ABSTRACT. Current paper evaluates the performance of confined beef cattle supplemented with amylolytic enzyme complex produced by fungus Aspergillus awamori and a commercial product containing multienzyme complex, yeast and MOS. Treatments comprised control (basal diet composed of 16% Mombasa grass silage, 66% ground corn, 3% vitamin nuclear mineral and 15% cottonseed meal), amylase treatment (control diet with the addition of 48.7 saccharifying units kg of the dry matter diet). The addition of products did no… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, results obtained in the literature are inconsistent regarding the enzymes use on performance of the animals in these dietary conditions (Beauchemin, Rode, & Sewalt, 1995;DiLorenzo et al, 2011;Hristov, McAllister, & Cheng, 2000;Oliveira et al, 2015). This inconsistency of results can be attributed in part to differences in activity and characteristics of the enzymes used in each study, as well as physical and chemical properties of the diet, since enzymes performance are related with substrate specificity (Meale, Beauchemin, Hristov, Chaves, & McAllister, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, results obtained in the literature are inconsistent regarding the enzymes use on performance of the animals in these dietary conditions (Beauchemin, Rode, & Sewalt, 1995;DiLorenzo et al, 2011;Hristov, McAllister, & Cheng, 2000;Oliveira et al, 2015). This inconsistency of results can be attributed in part to differences in activity and characteristics of the enzymes used in each study, as well as physical and chemical properties of the diet, since enzymes performance are related with substrate specificity (Meale, Beauchemin, Hristov, Chaves, & McAllister, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…These results suggest a better adaptation to energy-dense diets for ENZ group. However, during the other phases, ENZ did not show a favorable effect (p > 0.05) on ADG, DMI in kg day Oliveira et al, 2015), with the exception of adaptation period. Meale et al (2014) consider that to obtain results in performance using enzymes, the type and amount of substrate, amount of enzymes, and enzymesubstrate relationship must be adequate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Low fecal pH was related to the large quantity of starch in feces of feedlot cattle fed high‐grain diets (Oliveira et al, ). Consequently, more starch flows to the large intestine, resulting in secondary fermentation and increased production of short‐chain fatty acids that decreases pH (Depenbusch et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low fecal pH was related to the large quantity of starch in feces of feedlot cattle fed high-grain diets (Oliveira et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An amylolytic enzyme complex produced by fungus Aspergillus awamori and a commercial product containing multienzyme complex, yeast and MOS evaluated in confined beef cattle were not able to improve animal performance. 41 Although, application of enzymes has proven to increase the feed value of poor quality feedstuffs, its use by smallholder farmers is, for the time being, economically unattractive. Especially, the use of lignin-degrading enzymes, originating from white rot fungi and which selectively target lignin seems a promising development.…”
Section: Enzyme Feed Additives For Ruminantsmentioning
confidence: 99%