Effects of Goal Specificity, Goal Difficulty, and Information Feedback on Endurance Performance

Abstract

The purpose of the present investigation was twofold: first, to examine the relationship between goal difficulty, goal specificity, and endurance performance in a physical activity setting, and second, to determine the relationship between different types of information feedback, goals, and performance. Subjects (N = 94) performed on a hand dynamometer endurance task, being asked to hold a one-third maximum contraction for as long as possible. The subjects were randomly assigned to one of the following goal-setting conditions: (a) Do your best, (b) improve by 40 s, or (c) improve by 70 s. They were provided with either concurrent or terminal feedback in a 2 x 3 x 2 (feedback x goals x trials) design. Performance results indicated a significant goals-by-trials interaction with the 40- and 70-s goal groups exhibiting significantly more improvement than the "do your best" group. No significant performance differences were found between the two feedback groups. However, significant differences in the performance-associated cognitions of the feedback groups indicated a preference for concurrent feedback as an adjunct to goals. Results are discussed in terms of Locke's goal-setting theory as well as some recent field research investigating the goal-setting performance relationship in physical education settings.

The Effect of Goal Setting Difficulty on Serving Success in Table Tennis and the Mediating Mechanism of Self-regulation

“…However, in their meta-analysis, Kyllo and Landers (1995) found that moderately difficult goals led to the best performances. The same conclusions have been drawn from other studies (Hall and Weinberg, 1987; Ji et al, 1998; Weinberg et al, 1985). Atkinson and Reitman (1956) found an inverse curvilinear relationship between task difficulty and performance: moderately difficult goals were associated with the most effort, while hard and easy goals resulted in less effort.…”

Performance targets, effort and risk-taking

“…These results are found both inside and outside the laboratory environment: woods workers given speci…c targets recorded signi…cantly higher levels of productivity than did those in a 'do your best'condition (Latham and Baldes, 1975;Latham and Kinne, 1974;Ronan et al, 1973). 4 Levels of persistence on di¢ cult tasks are found to increase as the target level is raised (Hall et al, 1987;LaPorte and Nath, 1976;Stevenson et al, 1984). Consistent with these …ndings, Terpstra and Rozell (1994) …nd a positive relationship between reported pro…tability and use of target setting in questionnaire data from one thousand US employers.…”

Six Sigma: a goal‐theoretic perspective

“…Huber (1985b) found that subjects with hard goals on a computer maze task worked longer to complete the task than subjects given do-best goals. Hall et al (1987) found that students compressed a hand dynamometer longer if they had specific, hard goals than do-best goals. Huber and Neale (1987) found that subjects engaged in a bargaining task were less willing to compromise and thus held out losnger than subjects given a do-best goal.…”