“…The intriguing issue of Pleistocene survival of hard beech in South Westland, suggested by Mark & Lee (1985), was contested by Wardle et al (1988), who proposed that this relatively cold-intolerant disjunct species of Nothofagus could have been reconstituted during the Holocene through long-distance hybridisation with the resident hardier species, in this case mountain beech They cited comparable cases from the literature However, this hypothesis was subsequently dismissed by Haase (1992), whose gel electrophoresis and isozyme variation techniques indicated that the small South Westland populations of hard beech possess relatively low genetic diversity, without any indication of recent gene transfer from mountain beech Haase's results were interpreted as evidence for in situ survival of hard beech in South Westland during the glacial maximum But where 7 Landscape and habitat disturbances from various causes obviously are major ecological factors throughout the south-west, as in other regions of New Zealand This justifies continued research for both its basic ecological information as well as its application to human and ecosystem welfare Fortunately, such research is continuing in this region (Smith & Lee 1984, Duncan 1993, R P Duncan and G H Stewart pers comm 1995, P Wardle unpubl data), and new approaches are being attempted (Smith et al 1994) I am sure we all hope and trust that the excitement, challenges (Fig 29), and importance of Te Waahipounamu, the South-west New Zealand World Heritage Area, will be sufficient to maintain and increase the research investment that has been made to date …”