2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136909
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of fuel injection and energy efficiency on the production and environmental parameters of electric arc furnace -heat recovery systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The calculation methods of chemical reaction heat of carbon powder and coal gas are shown in equations ( 22) and (23). The energy substitution relationships between carbon powder, coal gas and electricity are shown in equations (24) and (25). The main components of carbon powder and gas are C and CO, respectively.…”
Section: Effects Of Carbon Powder and Coal Gas On Electricity Consump...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The calculation methods of chemical reaction heat of carbon powder and coal gas are shown in equations ( 22) and (23). The energy substitution relationships between carbon powder, coal gas and electricity are shown in equations (24) and (25). The main components of carbon powder and gas are C and CO, respectively.…”
Section: Effects Of Carbon Powder and Coal Gas On Electricity Consump...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhang et al 24 compared the material and energy consumption and carbon emissions of coal-based DRI-EAF, gas-based DRI-EAF, 100% scrap-EAF and several other steelmaking scenarios based on the historical China Steel Yearbook data. Yang et al 7 and Tian et al 16,25 developed the life cycle assessment model based on the actual EAF smelting data of the charge structure of HM and scrap, and explored the environment impact and economic benefit of EAF steelmaking process with different HM ratio. Zhu et al 26 displayed the production technical indicators of eight EAF mills, and compared the consumption level and cost of the selected three EAF smelting modes (100% scrap, 70% scrap + 30% HM, 40% scrap + 60% HM).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%