2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemphyslip.2009.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of frequency and power of ultrasound on the size reduction of liposome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
65
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
9
65
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The results indicated that ultrasonic bath was not an effective method to reduce particle size. These results were consistent with other studies [8][9][10] showing that reducing process was more effective when liposome was poured direct into the bath, with higher ultrasonic frequency (at least 80 kHz) and it should be adjusted during the operation.…”
Section: Results From Ultrasonic Methodssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The results indicated that ultrasonic bath was not an effective method to reduce particle size. These results were consistent with other studies [8][9][10] showing that reducing process was more effective when liposome was poured direct into the bath, with higher ultrasonic frequency (at least 80 kHz) and it should be adjusted during the operation.…”
Section: Results From Ultrasonic Methodssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The ultrasonic intensity measured was 12.25 W/cm 2 at ultrasound power of 110 W. This fact confirms that the electrical output of the ultrasonic generator does not provide enough information about the ultrasonic intensity applied to a medium and that, in the experiments, part of the ultrasound energy is converted to heat and reflected back to the transducer, while another part of energy could be absorbed by material and its surrounding medium [16,17].…”
Section: Calorimetrymentioning
confidence: 61%
“…[23] The required amounts of CL 2À and EL solutions or CL 2À and DPPC solutions in am ethanol/chloroform (1:1 wt/wt) binary mixture were mixed, and the organic solvents were removed on av acuum rotary evaporator at 30 8C. At hin layer of the lipid mixture was dispersed in a1 0 À2 m borate buffer with pH 9.2, and then sonicated with aC ole-Parmer 4710 ultrasonic homogenizer for 400 sa t2 08Cf or the CL Liposomes in as odium chloride solution in the inner water pool were prepared through dispersion of the lipid film in a1 0 À3 m borate buffer containing 1 m NaCl.…”
Section: àmentioning
confidence: 97%