2004
DOI: 10.1116/1.1824068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of flare in extreme ultraviolet lithography: Learning from the engineering test stand

Abstract: One of the technical challenges for introducing extreme ultraviolet lithography (13.5 nm) into high volume manufacturing is flare. Flare reduces aerial image contrast and creates critical dimension (CD) variations across the die due to local chrome density dependent flare variations. Therefore, it is important to experimentally characterize flare on a full-field stepper and develop methods to mitigate and compensate for its effects. In this article, the impact of flare on depth of focus and exposure latitude a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The flare difference between horizontal and vertical features has been reported in a series of studies, [9][10][11] and it is generally referred to as horizontal-vertical flare anisotropy. Most of these studies however fail to accurately quantify the exact amount of such anisotropy.…”
Section: B Flare Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The flare difference between horizontal and vertical features has been reported in a series of studies, [9][10][11] and it is generally referred to as horizontal-vertical flare anisotropy. Most of these studies however fail to accurately quantify the exact amount of such anisotropy.…”
Section: B Flare Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…2 Even if part of the spread could be attributed to the dependence of the spectral characteristics of the source on its components and settings, the differences observed call for additional quantitative investigations on the amount of DUV OoB in EUVL scanners. 6,[9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] The flare caused by the EUV scattering on the optics roughness is generally larger as compared to optical scanners, and its lateral range (i.e., the distance over which flare matters) is extremely broad (millimeters or more). The proposed approach uses a purposely fabricated aluminum-coated mask with reflectivity that has been qualified in both EUV and DUV wavelength ranges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The flare level on EUVL tools is expected to be high compared to optical scanners, being inversely proportional to wavelength squared and proportional to the mirror surface roughness [4][5][6][7]. The flare specification for the EUV ADT is less than 16% which nevertheless could cause a significant degradation of the patterning performance of the tool.…”
Section: Flare and Shadowingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this simple method is not preferred in many practical cases since the unwanted dummies are printed. More preferable way is to implement straylight impact in OPC [6][7][8][9]. In OPC, an image is calculated as sum of convolution of mask and kernels which is known as Sum Of Coherent Systems (SOCS) [10].…”
Section: Brief Theory Of Stray Lightmentioning
confidence: 99%