2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.01.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of filler type and content on mechanical properties of photopolymerizable composites measured across two-dimensional combinatorial arrays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was observed that modulus obtained using nanoindentation agreed very well with results obtained by traditional wileyonlinelibrary.com 381 methods (p < 0.05), such as the three-point bending test. [ 60 ] These results highlight the effi ciency of using combinatorial techniques for identifying an optimal DC and composition for an intended application.…”
Section: Structure-property Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It was observed that modulus obtained using nanoindentation agreed very well with results obtained by traditional wileyonlinelibrary.com 381 methods (p < 0.05), such as the three-point bending test. [ 60 ] These results highlight the effi ciency of using combinatorial techniques for identifying an optimal DC and composition for an intended application.…”
Section: Structure-property Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…These libraries accommodate a range of characterization techniques from physical to chemical to biological. [60][61][62][63][64][65][66] …”
Section: Composition/curing Librariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A high recovery is indicative of elastic strain, whereas a lower recovery suggests significant plastic (permanent) deformation. 17 In Figure 6, all samples showed elastic recovery values greater than 60% for the four analyzed loads. These values are in the same range found for many different polymers submitted to scratch tests with different loads and geometry tips.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lowest DC of AL on the bottom surface, despite the highest filler content, may be related to the greatest attenuation of the incident light in AL. Generally other factors such as photoinitiator concentration, monomers commixture ratio, and degree of crosslink can also be involved to the resultant DC in addition to the light attenuation [19][20][21] . In the oral cavity, the restored composite resins always interact with water.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%